Kurotschka PK, Koch MJ, Bucher E, Figueiras A, Gensichen J, Hapfelmeier A, Hay AD, Kretzschmann C, Kurzai O, Lâm TT, Lasher K, Massidda O, Sanftenberg L, Schmiemann G, Schneider A, Simmenroth A, Stark S, Warkentin L, Ebell MH, Gágyor I (2025)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2025
Book Volume: 20
Pages Range: e0332390-
Journal Issue: 10
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332390
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel point-of-care test (POCT) management strategy including phase contrast microscopy for bacteriuria and urinary dipsticks for erythrocytes to guide antibiotic prescribing in women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in general practice. DESIGN: Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial in 20 general practices in Germany. Practices were assigned 1:1 to POCT-guided management or usual care. All urine samples were sent for urine culture. Follow-up over 28 days involved symptom diaries, telephone interviews, and medical record review. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were recruitment and retention rates. Secondary outcomes included total and inappropriate antibiotic use, symptom duration and burden, recurrent and upper UTIs, re-consultations, and diagnostic accuracy of microscopy versus urine culture. Mixed-effects models accounted for clustering. RESULTS: Over 8 months, 157 women were recruited (90 intervention, 67 control), median of 7.5 patients per practice (range 1-15). Participant retention at day 28 was 75%. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Antibiotic use was similar in both groups: 77% (intervention) vs. 79% (control) at initial consultation. The mean number of antibiotic courses over 28 days was 0.96 (intervention) vs. 1.00 (control), with no indication of reduced prescribing. Phase-contrast microscopy showed limited diagnostic accuracy, especially for ruling out infection (negative predictive value 46%). Exploratory analyses suggested that if GPs had access to urine culture results at the point of care, antibiotic prescribing in the intervention group could have been higher than in routine care. CONCLUSION: The POCT-guided management approach for suspected uUTIs is feasible but presents implementation and methodological challenges. Recruitment varied across sites and was lower in the control group practices, highlighting the risk of differential recruitment. Retention was below the expected 80%, indicating the need for efficient follow-up strategies in future trials. Explorative analyses suggest that simply adding diagnostic information may not support antibiotic stewardship. Novel POCTs should be carefully assessed for their influence on prescribing before routine use. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05667207.
APA:
Kurotschka, P.K., Koch, M.J., Bucher, E., Figueiras, A., Gensichen, J., Hapfelmeier, A.,... Gágyor, I. (2025). Dipsticks and point-of-care Microscopy in Urinary Tract Infections in primary care: Results of the MicUTI pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 20(10), e0332390-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332390
MLA:
Kurotschka, Peter K., et al. "Dipsticks and point-of-care Microscopy in Urinary Tract Infections in primary care: Results of the MicUTI pilot cluster randomised controlled trial." PLoS ONE 20.10 (2025): e0332390-.
BibTeX: Download