Consensus statement: Standardized reporting of power-producing luminescent solar concentrator performance

Yang C, Atwater HA, Baldo MA, Baran D, Barile CJ, Barr MC, Bates M, Bawendi MG, Bergren MR, Borhan B, Brabec C, Brovelli S, Bulovic V, Ceroni P, Debije MG, Delgado-Sanchez JM, Dong WJ, Duxbury PM, Evans RC, Forrest SR, Gamelin DR, Giebink NC, Gong X, Griffini G, Guo F, Herrera CK, Ho-Baillie AWY, Holmes RJ, Hong SK, Kirchartz T, Levine BG, Li H, Li Y, Liu D, Loi MA, Luscombe CK, Makarov NS, Mateen F, Mazzaro R, Mcdaniel H, Mcgehee MD, Meinardi F, Menendez-Velazquez A, Min J, Mitzi DB, Moemeni M, Moon JH, Nattestad A, Nazeeruddin MK, Nogueira AF, Paetzold UW, Patrick DL, Pucci A, Rand BP, Reichmanis E, Richards BS, Roncali J, Rosei F, Schmidt TW, So F, Tu CC, Vahdani A, Van Sark WGJHM, Verduzco R, Vomiero A, Wong WWH, Wu K, Yip HL, Zhang X, Zhao H, Lunt RR (2022)


Publication Type: Journal article, Editorial

Publication year: 2022

Journal

Book Volume: 6

Pages Range: 8-15

Journal Issue: 1

DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.004

Abstract

Fair and meaningful device performance comparison among luminescent solar concentrator-photovoltaic (LSC-PV) reports cannot be realized without a general consensus on reporting standards in LSC-PV research. Therefore, it is imperative to adopt standardized characterization protocols for these emerging types of PV devices that are consistent with other PV devices. This commentary highlights several common limitations in LSC literature and summarizes the best practices moving forward to harmonize with standard PV reporting, considering the greater nuances present with LSC-PV. Based on these practices, a checklist of actionable items is provided to help standardize the characterization/reporting protocols and offer a set of baseline expectations for authors, reviewers, and editors. The general consensus combined with the checklist will ultimately guide LSC-PV research towards reliable and meaningful advances.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

Michigan State University US United States (USA) (US) California Institute of Technology (Caltech) US United States (USA) (US) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) US United States (USA) (US) King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) / جامعة الملك عبد الله للعلوم و التقنية SA Saudi Arabia (SA) University of Nevada Las Vegas US United States (USA) (US) Ubiquitous Energy Inc US United States (USA) (US) UbiQD United States US United States (USA) (US) University of Cambridge GB United Kingdom (GB) Wuhan University of Technology CN China (CN) University of Sydney (USYD) AU Australia (AU) University of Groningen / Rijksuniversiteit Groningen NL Netherlands (NL) Dongguk University / 동국대학교 KR Korea, Republic of (KR) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) DE Germany (DE) Western Washington University (WWU) US United States (USA) (US) Shanghai Jiao Tong University / 上海交通大学 CN China (CN) University of Washington US United States (USA) (US) University of Bologna / Università di Bologna IT Italy (IT) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) US United States (USA) (US) University of Milano-Bicocca / Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, UNIMIB IT Italy (IT) IDONIAL ES Spain (ES) Duke University US United States (USA) (US) Sogang University KR Korea, Republic of (KR) University of Pisa / Università di Pisa (UniPi) IT Italy (IT) Princeton University US United States (USA) (US) Lehigh University US United States (USA) (US) Babeș-Bolyai University / Babeș–Bolyai Tudományegyetem / Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai (UBB) RO Romania (RO) Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) de l'Université du Québec CA Canada (CA) University of New South Wales (UNSW) AU Australia (AU) North Carolina State University US United States (USA) (US) Universiteit Utrecht (UU) / Utrecht University NL Netherlands (NL) Rice University US United States (USA) (US) Università Ca’ Foscari IT Italy (IT) The University of Melbourne AU Australia (AU) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) / 中国科学院 CN China (CN) South China University of Technology (SCUT) / 华南理工大学 CN China (CN) Ningbo University / 宁波大学 CN China (CN) Qingdao University / 青岛大学 CN China (CN) Eindhoven University of Technology / Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (TU/e) NL Netherlands (NL) University of Seville / Universidad de Sevilla ES Spain (ES) Washington State University (WSU) US United States (USA) (US) University of Michigan US United States (USA) (US) Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) US United States (USA) (US) Politecnico di Milano IT Italy (IT) Jinan University CN China (CN) University of Minnesota (UMN) US United States (USA) (US) Forschungszentrum Jülich / Research Centre Jülich (FZJ) DE Germany (DE) State University of New York at Albany (UNY Albany / UAlbany) US United States (USA) (US) Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT) / 北京理工大学 CN China (CN) Westlake Institute of Advanced Study WIAS CN China (CN) Wuhan University CN China (CN) Monash University AU Australia (AU) École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH Switzerland (CH) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) / University of Campinas BR Brazil (BR)

How to cite

APA:

Yang, C., Atwater, H.A., Baldo, M.A., Baran, D., Barile, C.J., Barr, M.C.,... Lunt, R.R. (2022). Consensus statement: Standardized reporting of power-producing luminescent solar concentrator performance. Joule, 6(1), 8-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.004

MLA:

Yang, Chenchen, et al. "Consensus statement: Standardized reporting of power-producing luminescent solar concentrator performance." Joule 6.1 (2022): 8-15.

BibTeX: Download