Modeling shelliness and alteration in shell beds: variation in hardpart input and burial rates leads to opposing predictions

Journal article


Publication Details

Author(s): Tomašových A, Fürsich F, Olszewski TD
Journal: Paleobiology
Publication year: 2006
Volume: 32
Journal issue: 2
Pages range: 278-298
ISSN: 0094-8373
Language: English


Abstract


Distinguishing the differential roles of hardpart-input rates and burial rates in the formation of shell beds is important in paleobiologic and sedimentologic studies, because high shelliness can reflect either high population density of shell producers or lack of sediment. The modeling in this paper shows that differences in the relative importance of burial rates and hardpart-input rates lead to distinct patterns with respect to the degree of shelliness and taphonomic alteration in shell beds. Our approach substantially complements other models because it allows computation of both shelliness and assemblage-level alteration. To estimate shelliness, we dissected hardpart-input rates into dead-shell production and shell destruction rates. To estimate assemblage-level alteration, we computed an alteration rate that describes how rapidly shells accrue postmortem damage. Under decreasing burial rates but constant hardpart-input rates, a positive correlation between alteration and shelliness is expected (Kidwell's R-sediment model). In contrast, under decreased destruction rates and/or increased dead-shell production rates and constant burial rates (Kidwell's R-hardpart model), a negative correlation between shelliness and alteration is expected. The contrasting predictions thus provide a theoretical basis for distinguishing whether high shell density in shell beds reflects passive shell accumulation due to a lack of sediment dilution or whether it instead reflects high shell input from a life assemblage. This approach should be applicable for any fossil assemblages that vary in shell density and assemblage-level alteration. An example from the Lower Jurassic of Morocco, which has shell-rich samples less altered than shell-poor samples, suggests that the higher shelliness correlates with higher community-level abundance and lower proportion of juveniles of the main shell producer, supporting the driving role of hardpart-input rates in the origin of the shell-rich samples in this case. This is of significance in paleoecologic analyses because variations in shelliness can directly reflect fluctuations in population density of shell producers. © 2006 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.



FAU Authors / FAU Editors

Fürsich, Franz Prof. Dr.
Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät


Additional Organisation
Lehrstuhl für Paläoumwelt


External institutions with authors

Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) / Slovenská akadémia vied (SAV)
Texas A&M University


How to cite

APA:
Tomašových, A., Fürsich, F., & Olszewski, T.D. (2006). Modeling shelliness and alteration in shell beds: variation in hardpart input and burial rates leads to opposing predictions. Paleobiology, 32(2), 278-298. https://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2006)32[278:MSAAIS]2.0.CO;2

MLA:
Tomašových, Adam, Franz Fürsich, and Thomas D. Olszewski. "Modeling shelliness and alteration in shell beds: variation in hardpart input and burial rates leads to opposing predictions." Paleobiology 32.2 (2006): 278-298.

BibTeX: 

Last updated on 2019-22-07 at 07:31