Lachowiez CA, Zeidner JF, Othman J, Kaempf A, Yun S, Heiblig M, Heuser M, Shahswar R, Madero Marroquin R, Cannova JM, Žučenka A, Marvin-Peek J, Senapati J, Abaza Y, Swaroop A, Zacheo I, Monaco F, Belhabri A, Tauveron-Jalenques U, Tavernier E, Carré M, Aspas Requena G, Cook RJ, Traer E, Saultz JN, O'Nions J, Basheer F, Laurie J, Handa S, Stein EM, Baer MR, Olin R, Blum W, Schiller G, Lin T, Curran E, Yocum A, Madarang E, Daver N, Kadia TM, Marconi G, Madanat Y, Dillon R, DiNardo CD, Swords R, Arango Ossa JE, Watts J, Loghavi S, Pollyea DA, Bernard E, Patel , Patel AA, Stock W, Drekolias D, Zahra FT, Long N, Swaroop A, Huang Y, Welkie RL (2026)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2026
Book Volume: 44
Pages Range: 2422-2434
Journal Issue: 25
DOI: 10.1200/JCO-26-00347
PURPOSE: As risk stratification for patients with AML treated with lower-intensity venetoclax-based therapy remains suboptimal, we developed and validated a prognostic model integrating clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular features. METHODS: We assembled a multinational data set comprising 2,092 adults with newly diagnosed AML treated with hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax (HMA + VEN). One thousand nine hundred eighteen patients with complete data were randomly divided into training (70%) and internal validation (30%) cohorts. Two independent external validation cohorts were assembled (n = 500 and n = 222). Modeling overall survival (OS), Elastic Net regression was applied in 1,000 bootstrap samples from the training cohort to select variables for a Ridge regression, which generated a continuous Prognostic Risk Integration for Survival Modeling (PRISM) score and risk categories based on tertiles (PRISM-3: low, moderate, high). These PRISM indices were then computed for the validation cohorts and compared with the 4-gene classifier (based on mutations in FLT3-ITD, N/KRAS, and TP53). RESULTS: PRISM integrated 17 clinical and genomic variables and demonstrated a linear association with OS. PRISM-3 stratified survival consistently across all cohorts (median OS: 25.1-28.8 months for low risk, 12.5-14.7 months for moderate risk, and 5.8-6.7 months for high risk; P < .001). Compared with the 4-gene classifier, PRISM-3 reassigned approximately 40% of patients (and >50% of those with favorable risk) and demonstrated significantly better discrimination in validation cohorts (C-index 0.63-0.65 v 0.59-0.61; P < .05). CONCLUSION: PRISM is a validated prognostic model for patients with AML receiving HMA + VEN that improves survival risk stratification beyond current standard tools and supports individualized, risk-adapted clinical decision making. The model, the PRISM-AML Risk Calculator, is publicly available.
APA:
Lachowiez, C.A., Zeidner, J.F., Othman, J., Kaempf, A., Yun, S., Heiblig, M.,... Welkie, R.L. (2026). Risk Prognostication After Hypomethylating Agents Combined With Venetoclax in AML: The PRISM Risk Model. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 44(25), 2422-2434. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-00347
MLA:
Lachowiez, Curtis A., et al. "Risk Prognostication After Hypomethylating Agents Combined With Venetoclax in AML: The PRISM Risk Model." Journal of Clinical Oncology 44.25 (2026): 2422-2434.
BibTeX: Download