Von Hoff K, Obrecht-Sturm D, Ghasemi DR, Wenning J, Mynarek M, Gerber NU, Benesch M, Juhnke BO, Bison B, Warmuth-Metz M, Timmermann B, Faldum A, Tippelt S, Fleischhack G, Grotzer M, Hernáiz Driever P, Beilken A, Ebinger M, Graf N, Frühwald MC, Schmid I, Slavc I, Koch A, Bergmann M, Hagel C, Coras R, Blümcke I, Reifenberger G, Felsberg J, Keyvani K, Harter PN, Prinz M, Staszewski O, Acker T, Stadelmann-Nessler C, Hartmann C, Von Deimling A, Sommer C, Hasselblatt M, Riemenschneider MJ, Monoranu CM, Rushing E, Haberler C, Kool M, Sill M, Pfister SM, Schüller U, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD, Kwiecien R, Witt H, Pajtler KW, Rutkowski S (2026)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2026
Book Volume: 28
Pages Range: 520-534
Journal Issue: 2
BackgroundCurrent treatment strategies for pediatric intracranial ependymoma do not consider molecular heterogeneity. Here, we evaluated molecular group-specific determinants of outcome and developed an improved risk stratification model. Methods Patients aged 0-21 years with localized intracranial ependymoma were enrolled into the prospective clinical trial E-HIT2000. Treatment included maximum safe surgery, local radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, stratified according to age, histology and, following a major amendment, residual tumor. Clinical data were analyzed in a pooled molecularly annotated cohort with data from patients treated analogously within subsequent registries. Results For 291 trial patients, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62 ± 3% and 81 ± 2%, respectively. For the molecularly annotated pooled cohort (n = 228), 5-year PFS/OS were: posterior-fossa group A ependymoma (EPN-PFA) (n = 146): 45 ± 4%/77 ± 4%; posterior-fossa group B ependymoma (EPN-PFB) (n = 19): 90 ± 7%/100%; supratentorial ependymoma, ZFTA fusion-positive (EPN-ZFTA) (n = 59): 64 ± 7%/86 ± 5%; supratentorial ependymoma, YAP1 fusion-positive (EPN-YAP1) (n = 4): 50 ± 25%/100%. Patients with EPN-PFA without molecular risk factors (1q gain, and/or subtype EPN-PFA1c/d/e, 2a), with complete resection, and postoperative radiotherapy showed favorable outcomes (5-year PFS/OS 75 ± 10%/92 ± 7%). For patients with EPN-PFA with molecular risk factors, prognosis was poor irrespective of residual tumor status (5-year PFS/OS: 33 ± 6%/64 ± 6%). Among EPN-ZFTA, 11/59 tumors were classified as EPN-ZFTA with alternative fusions, associated with inferior PFS (5-year PFS/OS: 36 ± 15%/91 ± 9%). For EPN-ZFTA-RELA, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A were associated with unfavorable outcomes (4-year PFS/OS: 19 ± 16%/57 ± 18% vs. 79 ± 7%/97 ± 3%, P =. 0001). Finally, we developed a novel stratification model that discriminates standard and intermediate risk patients from those at high risk (P <. 0001 for PFS and OS). Conclusions These results strongly suggest the inclusion of molecular parameters into stratification and the use of distinct treatment strategies within future ependymoma trials.
APA:
Von Hoff, K., Obrecht-Sturm, D., Ghasemi, D.R., Wenning, J., Mynarek, M., Gerber, N.U.,... Rutkowski, S. (2026). Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries. Neuro-Oncology, 28(2), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf218
MLA:
Von Hoff, Katja, et al. "Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries." Neuro-Oncology 28.2 (2026): 520-534.
BibTeX: Download