Cost-effectiveness of population-wide screening for intracranial aneurysms revisited in light of potential diagnostic developments
Veldeman M, Schöffski O, Hoellig A, Rinkel GJ (2025)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2025
Journal
Article Number: 17474930251344506
DOI: 10.1177/17474930251344506
Abstract
Background: Preventive treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) has the potential to reduce aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) incidence. Population-wide screening (PWS) for UIAs has been disregarded, as it remains unclear how to manage low-risk UIAs. Higher cost for SAH treatment, along with improvements in UIA treatment decision-making, might improve the risk–benefit and cost–benefit ratios for PWS. Currently, blood-based screening tests for UIAs are under development and might be suitable for use in PWS. Aims: This study sets out to identify what health economic criteria should be met by a hypothetical UIA screening test to justify PWS. Methods: A Markov model was built to compare PWS versus standard of care. Model parameterization was done using real-world data derived from the population cared for by the RWTH Aachen University Hospital. Data in relation to SAH were derived from a prospective registry of consecutive SAH patients (n = 275). In addition, a database of newly diagnosed UIAs was retrospectively collected (n = 139). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to illustrate the annual cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine at which price point the PWS strategy would become cost-effective based on different levels of willingness-to-pay (WTP). Results: In a one-way sensitivity analysis, the price of a hypothetical screening test was varied between €1 and €811.3 (mean cost of magnetic resonance angiography). In case of a WTP of €50,000 per QALY gained, the cost per test may be €225.72 and remain cost-effective. If the same test could also be used for watchful-waiting in low-risk patients (i.e. assess the risk of aneurysm growth), the price may increase up to €294.19. There is no price point at which PWS would become dominant and yield negative ICERs. Conclusion: PWS for UIAs is unlikely to be cost-effective, even with new blood screening technologies. However, once patents expire, and price monopolies are broken, use of such technologies may become more attractive for health policymakers, depending on their WTP.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
Germany (DE)How to cite
APA:
Veldeman, M., Schöffski, O., Hoellig, A., & Rinkel, G.J. (2025). Cost-effectiveness of population-wide screening for intracranial aneurysms revisited in light of potential diagnostic developments. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251344506
MLA:
Veldeman, Michael, et al. "Cost-effectiveness of population-wide screening for intracranial aneurysms revisited in light of potential diagnostic developments." International Journal of Stroke (2025).
BibTeX: Download