Handke L, Costa P, Hincapie M, Johnson M (2025)
Publication Type: Journal article, Review article
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.1002/job.2875
Despite the substantial proliferation of hybrid work, little has been done to reconcile extant individual- and team-level perspectives. This is problematic because it does not acknowledge how individuals' hybrid work practices constrain team-level interactions and subsequent outcomes. Specifically, the extant literature does not yet capture the complex configurations that result from team members alternating between co-located and remote forms of collaboration and how these may provoke the formation of subgroups within the team. In this conceptual paper, we introduce the construct co-location imbalance, which we define as the disparity in co-location between different combinations of team members, as a way of capturing geographic configurations in hybrid teams. Through illustrative hybrid teamwork archetypes, we demonstrate the meaning and implications of co-location imbalance on subgroup formation. We then map out a nomological network surrounding co-location imbalance and derive testable propositions on its temporal dynamics and antecedents. Our paper concludes with a discussion of our research's theoretical and practical contributions and directions to advance future research on hybrid teamwork.
APA:
Handke, L., Costa, P., Hincapie, M., & Johnson, M. (2025). Not Even Remotely Close: How Co-Location Imbalance Affects Subgroup Formation in Hybrid Teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2875
MLA:
Handke, Lisa, et al. "Not Even Remotely Close: How Co-Location Imbalance Affects Subgroup Formation in Hybrid Teams." Journal of Organizational Behavior (2025).
BibTeX: Download