BOB CAT: A large-scale review and delphi consensus for management of Barrett's esophagus with no dysplasia, indefinite for, or low-grade dysplasia

Bennett C, Moayyedi P, Corley DA, Decaestecker J, Falck-Ytter Y, Falk G, Vakil N, Sanders S, Vieth M, Inadomi J, Aldulaimi D, Ho KY, Odze R, Meltzer SJ, Quigley E, Gittens S, Watson P, Zaninotto G, Iyer PG, Alexandre L, Ang Y, Callaghan J, Harrison R, Singh R, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Geramizadeh B, Kaye P, Krishnadath S, Fennerty MB, Manner H, Nason KS, Pech O, Konda V, Ragunath K, Rahman I, Romero Y, Sampliner R, Siersema PD, Tack J, Tham TC, Trudgill N, Weinberg DS, Wang J, Wang K, Wong JY, Attwood S, Malfertheiner P, MacDonald D, Barr H, Ferguson MK, Jankowski J (2015)


Publication Type: Journal article, Review article

Publication year: 2015

Journal

Book Volume: 110

Pages Range: 662-682

Journal Issue: 5

DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.55

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common premalignant lesion for which surveillance is recommended. This strategy is limited by considerable variations in clinical practice. We conducted an international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of BE and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD).METHODS:We defined the scope, proposed statements, and searched electronic databases, yielding 20,558 publications that were screened, selected online, and formed the evidence base. We used a Delphi consensus process, with an 80% agreement threshold, using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to categorize the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.RESULTS:In total, 80% of respondents agreed with 55 of 127 statements in the final voting rounds. Population endoscopic screening is not recommended and screening should target only very high-risk cases of males aged over 60 years with chronic uncontrolled reflux. A new international definition of BE was agreed upon. For any degree of dysplasia, at least two specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists are required. Risk factors for cancer include male gender, length of BE, and central obesity. Endoscopic resection should be used for visible, nodular areas. Surveillance is not recommended for <5 years of life expectancy. Management strategies for indefinite dysplasia (IND) and LGD were identified, including a de-escalation strategy for lower-risk patients and escalation to intervention with follow-up for higher-risk patients.CONCLUSIONS:In this uniquely large consensus process in gastroenterology, we made key clinical recommendations for the escalation/de-escalation of BE in clinical practice. We made strong recommendations for the prioritization of future research.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) US United States (USA) (US) Johns Hopkins Hospital US United States (USA) (US) Houston Methodist US United States (USA) (US) Queen's University GB United Kingdom (GB) Mayo Clinic US United States (USA) (US) University of East Anglia GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Manchester GB United Kingdom (GB) University Hospital Southampton NHS GB United Kingdom (GB) Oregon Health and Science University (OSHU) US United States (USA) (US) Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL) / Catholic University of Leuven BE Belgium (BE) Durham University GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Chicago US United States (USA) (US) Coventry University GB United Kingdom (GB) McMaster University CA Canada (CA) Kaiser Permanente US United States (USA) (US) Leicester General Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Case Western Reserve University US United States (USA) (US) University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) US United States (USA) (US) University of Wisconsin - Madison US United States (USA) (US) University of Warwick GB United Kingdom (GB) Klinikum Bayreuth DE Germany (DE) University of Arizona US United States (USA) (US) University of Washington US United States (USA) (US) Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust GB United Kingdom (GB) National University of Singapore (NUS) SG Singapore (SG) University of Adelaide AU Australia (AU) Queen Alexandra Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) University Hospital Leuven (UZ) / Universitaire ziekenhuizen Leuven BE Belgium (BE) Shiraz University of Medical Sciences / دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز IR Iran, Islamic Republic of (IR) Nottingham University Hospitals GB United Kingdom (GB) Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam UMC) / Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra NL Netherlands (NL) University of Pittsburgh US United States (USA) (US) University of Nottingham GB United Kingdom (GB) University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC Utrecht) NL Netherlands (NL) University of Ulster GB United Kingdom (GB) Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Fox Chase Cancer Center US United States (USA) (US) Washington University in St. Louis US United States (USA) (US) NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine SG Singapore (SG) Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg DE Germany (DE) University of British Columbia CA Canada (CA) Gloucestershire Hospitals GB United Kingdom (GB) Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder DE Germany (DE) University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire GB United Kingdom (GB)

How to cite

APA:

Bennett, C., Moayyedi, P., Corley, D.A., Decaestecker, J., Falck-Ytter, Y., Falk, G.,... Jankowski, J. (2015). BOB CAT: A large-scale review and delphi consensus for management of Barrett's esophagus with no dysplasia, indefinite for, or low-grade dysplasia. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 110(5), 662-682. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.55

MLA:

Bennett, Cathy, et al. "BOB CAT: A large-scale review and delphi consensus for management of Barrett's esophagus with no dysplasia, indefinite for, or low-grade dysplasia." American Journal of Gastroenterology 110.5 (2015): 662-682.

BibTeX: Download