Stief F, Holder J, Braun S, Brenneis M, van Drongelen S, Byrnes SK, Layher F, Dussa CU, Meurer A, Böhm H (2024)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2024
Book Volume: 14
Article Number: 16060
Journal Issue: 1
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66169-9
Predictors of rebound after correction of coronal plane deformities using temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (TH) are not well defined. The following research questions were tested: (1) Is the dynamic knee joint load useful to improve rebound prediction accuracy? (2) Does a large initial deformity play a critical role in rebound development? (3) Are BMI and a young age risk factors for rebound? Fifty children and adolescents with idiopathic knee valgus malalignment were included. A deviation of the mechanical femorotibial angle (MFA) of ≥ 3° into valgus between explantation and the one-year follow-up period was chosen to classify a rebound. A rebound was detected in 22 of the 50 patients (44%). Two predictors of rebound were identified: 1. reduced peak lateral knee joint contact force in the first half of the stance phase at the time of explantation (72.7% prediction); 2. minor initial deformity according to the MFA (70.5% prediction). The best prediction (75%) was obtained by including both parameters in the binary logistic regression method. A TH should not be advised in patients with a minor initial deformity of the leg axis. Dynamic knee joint loading using gait analysis and musculoskeletal modeling can be used to determine the optimum time to remove the plates.
APA:
Stief, F., Holder, J., Braun, S., Brenneis, M., van Drongelen, S., Byrnes, S.K.,... Böhm, H. (2024). Relevance of instrumented gait analysis in the prediction of the rebound phenomenon after guided growth intervention. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66169-9
MLA:
Stief, Felix, et al. "Relevance of instrumented gait analysis in the prediction of the rebound phenomenon after guided growth intervention." Scientific Reports 14.1 (2024).
BibTeX: Download