Alkassar M, Engelhardt S, Abu-Tair T, Ojeda E, Treffer PC, Weyand M, Rompel O (2023)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2023
Book Volume: 13
Article Number: 3162
Journal Issue: 20
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203162
This study investigates the crucial factors influencing the end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes in MRI volumetry and their direct effects on the derived functional parameters. Through the simultaneous acquisition of 2D-cine and 3D whole-heart slices in end-diastole and end-systole, we present a novel direct comparison of the volumetric measurements from both methods. A prospective study was conducted with 18 healthy participants. Both 2D-cine and 3D whole-heart sequences were obtained. Despite the differences in the creation of 3D volumes and trigger points, the impact on the LV volume was minimal (134.9 mL ± 16.9 mL vs. 136.6 mL ± 16.6 mL, p < 0.01 for end-diastole; 50.6 mL ± 11.0 mL vs. 51.6 mL ± 11.2 mL, p = 0.03 for end-systole). In our healthy patient cohort, a systematic underestimation of the end-systolic volume resulted in a significant overestimation of the SV (5.6 mL ± 2.6 mL, p < 0.01). The functional calculations from the 3D whole-heart method proved to be highly accurate and correlated well with function measurements from the phase-contrast sequences. Our study is the first to demonstrate the superiority of 3D whole-heart volumetry over 2D-cine volumetry and sheds light on the systematic error inherent in 2D-cine measurements.
APA:
Alkassar, M., Engelhardt, S., Abu-Tair, T., Ojeda, E., Treffer, P.C., Weyand, M., & Rompel, O. (2023). Comparative Study of 2D-Cine and 3D-wh Volumetry: Revealing Systemic Error of 2D-Cine Volumetry. Diagnostics, 13(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203162
MLA:
Alkassar, Muhnnad, et al. "Comparative Study of 2D-Cine and 3D-wh Volumetry: Revealing Systemic Error of 2D-Cine Volumetry." Diagnostics 13.20 (2023).
BibTeX: Download