Wittmann J (2023)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2023
Book Volume: 256-257
Pages Range: 42-47
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2023.04.002
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made great progress in recent years. The latest chatbot to make a splash is ChatGPT. To see if this type of AI could also be helpful in creating an immunological review article, I put a planned review on different classes of small RNAs during murine B cell development to the test. Although the general wording sounded very polished and convincing, ChatGPT encountered great difficulties when asked for details and references and made many incorrect statements, leading me to conclude that this kind of AI is not (yet?) suitable for assisting in the writing of scientific articles.
APA:
Wittmann, J. (2023). Science fact vs science fiction: A ChatGPT immunological review experiment gone awry. Immunology letters, 256-257, 42-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2023.04.002
MLA:
Wittmann, Jürgen. "Science fact vs science fiction: A ChatGPT immunological review experiment gone awry." Immunology letters 256-257 (2023): 42-47.
BibTeX: Download