One year of digital health applications (DiGA) in Germany - Rheumatologists' perspectives

Richter JG, Chehab G, Stachwitz P, Hagen J, Larsen D, Knitza J, Schneider M, Voormann A, Specker C (2022)

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2022

Journal

Frontiers in Medicine Frontiers Media

Book Volume: 9

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1000668

Abstract

BackgroundBased on given legislation the German approach to digital health applications (DiGA) allows reimbursed prescription of approved therapeutic software products since October 2020. For the first time, we evaluated DiGA-related acceptance, usage, and level of knowledge among members of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) 1 year after its legal implementation. Materials and methodsAn anonymous cross-sectional online survey, initially designed by the health innovation hub (think tank and sparring partner of the German Federal Ministry of Health) and the German Pain Society was adapted to the field of rheumatology. The survey was promoted by DGRh newsletters and Twitter-posts. Ethical approval was obtained. ResultsIn total, 75 valid response-sets. 80% reported to care >= 70% of their working time for patients with rheumatic diseases. Most were working in outpatient clinics/offices (54%) and older than 40 years (84%). Gender distribution was balanced (50%). 70% knew the possibility to prescribe DiGA. Most were informed of this for the first time via trade press (63%), and only 8% via the scientific/professional society. 46% expect information on DiGA from the scientific societies/medical chambers (35%) but rarely from the manufacturer (10%) and the responsible ministry (4%). Respondents would like to be informed about DiGA via continuing education events (face-to-face 76%, online 84%), trade press (86%), and manufacturers ' test-accounts (64%). Only 7% have already prescribed a DiGA, 46% planned to do so, and 47% did not intend DiGA prescriptions. Relevant aspects for prescription are provided. 86% believe that using DiGA/medical apps would at least partially be feasible and understandable to their patients. 83% thought that data collected by the patients using DiGA or other digital solutions could at least partially influence health care positively. 51% appreciated to get DiGA data directly into their patient documentation system/electronic health record (EHR) and 29% into patient-owned EHR. ConclusionDigital health applications awareness was high whereas prescription rate was low. Mostly, physician-desired aspects for DiGA prescriptions were proven efficacy and efficiency for physicians and patients, risk of adverse effects and health care costs were less important. Evaluation of patients' barriers and needs is warranted. Our results might contribute to the implementation and dissemination of DiGA.

Authors with CRIS profile

Johannes Knitza Department of Medicine 3 – Rheumatology and Immunology

Involved external institutions

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf DE Germany (DE) health innovation hub (hih) DE Germany (DE) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie e.V. (DGRh) DE Germany (DE) Kliniken Essen-Mitte DE Germany (DE)

How to cite

APA:

Richter, J.G., Chehab, G., Stachwitz, P., Hagen, J., Larsen, D., Knitza, J.,... Specker, C. (2022). One year of digital health applications (DiGA) in Germany - Rheumatologists' perspectives. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1000668

MLA:

Richter, Jutta G., et al. "One year of digital health applications (DiGA) in Germany - Rheumatologists' perspectives." Frontiers in Medicine 9 (2022).

BibTeX: Download