Autonomous killer robots are probably good news
Simpson TW, Müller VC (2014)
Publication Type: Conference contribution
Publication year: 2014
Journal
Publisher: IOS Press
Book Volume: 273
Pages Range: 297-305
Conference Proceedings Title: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Event location: Aarhus, DNK
ISBN: 9781614994794
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-480-0-297
Abstract
Will future lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) or 'killer robots', be a threat to humanity? In this policy paper, we argue that they do not take responsibility away from humans; in fact they increase the ability to hold humans accountable for war crimes. Also, using LAWS in war, as compared to a war without them, would probably make wars a bit less bad through an overall reduction of human suffering, especially in civilians. Finally, the availability of LAWS would probably not increase the probability of war or other lethal conflict-especially as compared to extant remote-controlled weapons. The European Parliament and a UN special rapporteur have called for a moratorium or ban of LAWS, supported by the vast majority of writers and campaigners on the issue. The 'Contracting Parties to the Geneva Convention at the United Nations' are presently discussing such a ban. However, the main arguments in favour of a ban are unsound. We are afraid of killer robots, but we should not be: They are probably good news.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
United Kingdom (GB)How to cite
APA:
Simpson, T.W., & Müller, V.C. (2014). Autonomous killer robots are probably good news. In Johanna Seibt, Marco Norskov, Raul Hakli (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 297-305). Aarhus, DNK: IOS Press.
MLA:
Simpson, Thomas W., and Vincent C. Müller. "Autonomous killer robots are probably good news." Proceedings of the Robo-Philosophy 2014: Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations, Aarhus, DNK Ed. Johanna Seibt, Marco Norskov, Raul Hakli, IOS Press, 2014. 297-305.
BibTeX: Download