Köbl J, Wechsler D, Kataev E, Williams FJ, Tsud N, Franchi S, Steinrück HP, Lytken O (2022)
Publication Type: Journal article, Erratum
Publication year: 2022
Book Volume: 717
Article Number: 122004
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2021.122004
In the original version of this article, Fig. 6 was plotted incorrectly, since in the input file the data on the polar angle axis were inserted in the inverse order. The correct Fig. 6 is shown below (caption remains unchanged). The error also concerns the deduced angles of the molecular plane relative to the surface plane (polar tilt angle), which are addressed in the manuscript on page 5, left column. The text should correctly read: "Fitting yields a polar tilt angle of 25° of the phenyl ring plane with respect to the surface normal with an azimuthal angle of 42° for the monodentate monolayer (380 K), and a polar tilt angle of 26° with an azimuthal angle of 43° for the mixed bidentate (or mono- and tridentate) monolayer (650–780 K). The fitting procedure was performed following the procedure from Ref. [37] In line with the unchanged electronic structure, the molecular orientation does not change (within the margin of error) when a monodentate monolayer of phenylphosphonic acid is annealed to form a mixed bidentate layer. Notably, for the onefold deprotonated bidentate, a polar tilt angle of ∼40° is estimated from Fig. 8 in Ref. [9]. For comparison, we note that 0.85 ML of phenylphosphonic acid adsorbs on anatase TiO
APA:
Köbl, J., Wechsler, D., Kataev, E., Williams, F.J., Tsud, N., Franchi, S.,... Lytken, O. (2022). CORRIGENDUM: Adsorption of phenylphosphonic acid on rutile TiO2(110) (Surface Science (2020) 698, (S0039602819309410), (10.1016/j.susc.2020.121612)). Surface Science, 717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2021.122004
MLA:
Köbl, Julia, et al. "CORRIGENDUM: Adsorption of phenylphosphonic acid on rutile TiO2(110) (Surface Science (2020) 698, (S0039602819309410), (10.1016/j.susc.2020.121612))." Surface Science 717 (2022).
BibTeX: Download