Beckmann K, Jud S, Hein A, Heusinger K, Bayer CM, Schwenk M, Häberle L, Beckmann M (2010)
Publication Type: Journal article, Review article
Publication year: 2010
Book Volume: 43
Pages Range: 400-410
Journal Issue: 5
DOI: 10.1007/s00129-009-2503-y
The rapid growth in medical documentation seen in recent decades has affected gynaecologic oncology as well. Particularly for malignant disorders the need for longitudinal and horizontal documentation, centralisation, guideline conformity, and quality management requires dealing with huge stores of data, often in different systems together (mammography screening, internal patient files, DMP, BQS/AQUA, studies, etc). Thanks in part to these redundancies, the mass of data can take on gigantic proportions. Some relief might be found from increased digitalisation, standardisation, and centralisation urged in the new German National Cancer Plan, mainly with respect to repeat data. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
APA:
Beckmann, K., Jud, S., Hein, A., Heusinger, K., Bayer, C.M., Schwenk, M.,... Beckmann, M. (2010). Documentation in Gynaecologic Oncology: Conflicts between quality management, science, efficacy, and liability Dokumentation in der gynäkologischen Onkologie: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Qualitätssicherung und Wissenschaft, Ergonomie und Rechtssicherheit. Gynäkologe, 43(5), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-009-2503-y
MLA:
Beckmann, K., et al. "Documentation in Gynaecologic Oncology: Conflicts between quality management, science, efficacy, and liability Dokumentation in der gynäkologischen Onkologie: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Qualitätssicherung und Wissenschaft, Ergonomie und Rechtssicherheit." Gynäkologe 43.5 (2010): 400-410.
BibTeX: Download