Hinz L, Metzner S, Müller P, Schulte RK, Besserer HB, Wackenrohr S, Sauer C, Kästner M, Hausotte T, Hübner S, Nuernberger F, Schleich B, Behrens BA, Wartzack S, Merklein M, Reithmeier E (2021)
Publication Language: English
Publication Type: Journal article, Online publication
Publication year: 2021
Book Volume: 21
Article Number: 2389
Journal Issue: 7
DOI: 10.3390/s21072389
Open Access Link: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/7/2389
Fringe projection profilometry in combination with other optical measuring technologies has established itself over the last decades as an essential complement to conventional, tactile measuring devices. The non-contact, holistic reconstruction of complex geometries within fractions of a second in conjunction with the lightweight and transportable sensor design open up many fields of application in production metrology. Furthermore, triangulation-based measuring principles feature good scalability, which has led to 3D scanners for various scale ranges. Innovative and modern production processes, such as sheet-bulk metal forming, thus, utilize fringe projection profilometry in many respects to monitor the process, quantify possible wear and improve production technology. Therefore, it is essential to identify the appropriate 3D scanner for each application and to properly evaluate the acquired data. Through precise knowledge of the measurement volume and the relative uncertainty with respect to the specimen and scanner position, adapted measurement strategies and integrated production concepts can be realized. Although there are extensive industrial standards and guidelines for the quantification of sensor performance, evaluation and tolerancing is mainly global and can, therefore, neither provide assistance in the correct, application-specific positioning and alignment of the sensor nor reflect the local characteristics within the measuring volume. Therefore, this article compares fringe projection systems across various scale ranges by positioning and scanning a calibrated sphere in a high resolution grid.
APA:
Hinz, L., Metzner, S., Müller, P., Schulte, R.K., Besserer, H.-B., Wackenrohr, S.,... Reithmeier, E. (2021). Fringe projection profilometry in production metrology: A multi-scale comparison in sheet-bulk metal forming. Sensors, 21(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072389
MLA:
Hinz, Lennart, et al. "Fringe projection profilometry in production metrology: A multi-scale comparison in sheet-bulk metal forming." Sensors 21.7 (2021).
BibTeX: Download