Koch A, Yzerbyt V, Abele-Brehm A, Ellemers N, Fiske ST (2021)
Publication Type: Book chapter / Article in edited volumes
Publication year: 2021
Publisher: Academic Press Inc.
Edited Volumes: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Book Volume: 63
Pages Range: 1-68
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.001
This chapter compares five models that analyze social evaluation from the micro, interpersonal to macro, many-group level: the Dual Perspective Model (DPM), Behavioral Regulation Model (BRM), Dimensional Compensation Model (DCM), Stereotype Content Model (SCM), and Agency-Beliefs-Communion (ABC) Model. A proper understanding of social evaluation must consider the models’ different types and numbers of perceivers, targets, and dimensions. By making a systematic comparison in the first part of the chapter, we sharpen the aim and scope of the complementary models and research programs supporting them. In the second part, we combine the models’ premises and evidence bases to generate new insights about social evaluation. In this way, we show that the models can expand and enrich one another. Our conclusion is that, instead of competing against one another, related theoretical perspectives are best compared and integrated to improve scientific insight about complex phenomena, such as social evaluation.
APA:
Koch, A., Yzerbyt, V., Abele-Brehm, A., Ellemers, N., & Fiske, S.T. (2021). Social evaluation: Comparing models across interpersonal, intragroup, intergroup, several-group, and many-group contexts. In Bertram Gawronski (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (pp. 1-68). Academic Press Inc..
MLA:
Koch, Alex, et al. "Social evaluation: Comparing models across interpersonal, intragroup, intergroup, several-group, and many-group contexts." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Ed. Bertram Gawronski, Academic Press Inc., 2021. 1-68.
BibTeX: Download