Praxeologische Feldforschung - Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien

Geiselhart K, Runkel S, Schäfer S, Schmid B (2021)


Publication Language: German

Publication Type: Journal article, Original article

Publication year: 2021

Journal

Book Volume: 76

Pages Range: 51-63

Journal Issue: 76

DOI: 10.5194/gh-76-51-2021

Abstract

This paper develops three analytical categories - range, supporting capacity, exigency/notability - to capture how supra-individual phenomena affect the people studied by empirical research. Researchers face a tension between constructivist and realist perspectives as the examined phenomena are simultaneously social constructs, in the way people perceive and understand them, and social facts in their consequences. Taking a critical perspective on the notion of large social phenomena - popularized by Theodore Schatzki - the paper develops an explorative terminology that aims to facilitate practice-oriented field research. Examples of empirical research on transition and degrowth initiatives illustrate how research subjects estimate the range of a phenomenon by trying to grasp whether they are in or out of its reach; the supportive capacity of a phenomenon by exploring how far it carries certain processes; and they experience the exigency of a phenomenon and ascribe a certain notability to it. Taken together, this terminology grasps the way phenomena are matters of concern, rather than matters of fact, for the research subjects.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Geiselhart, K., Runkel, S., Schäfer, S., & Schmid, B. (2021). Praxeologische Feldforschung - Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien. Geographica Helvetica, 76(76), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-51-2021

MLA:

Geiselhart, Klaus, et al. "Praxeologische Feldforschung - Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien." Geographica Helvetica 76.76 (2021): 51-63.

BibTeX: Download