Selection Effects in Students’ Evaluation of Teaching. Methodological Pitfalls for the Measurement of Teaching Quality.

Treischl E (2019)


Publication Type: Thesis

Publication year: 2019

Publisher: University of Mannheim

City/Town: Mannheim

Abstract

Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is an empirically well-established instrument for quality
assurance in higher education. Most research shows that SET is a reliable and valid instrument
to measure teaching quality from students’ perception and in accordance with Seldin’s
statement one may come to the conclusion, that: “the opinions of those who eat the dinner
should be considered if we want to know how it tastes” (Seldin 1993: 40). However, in many
instances students can select courses they want to attend before the course starts, and even in
mandatory courses students can often decide how regularly they attend. Fairness concern remain
if those who eat the dinner can decide which cuisine they prefer before the dinner starts.
And in terms of attendance, one may argue that SET results will be distorted if those who did
not like the dinner decided to go home before they were asked about their opinion. Against
this background this dissertation asks about the consequences of students’ course selection
and attendance for SET and provides four research papers about students’ selection effects.


Authors with CRIS profile

How to cite

APA:

Treischl, E. (2019). Selection Effects in Students’ Evaluation of Teaching. Methodological Pitfalls for the Measurement of Teaching Quality (Dissertation).

MLA:

Treischl, Edgar. Selection Effects in Students’ Evaluation of Teaching. Methodological Pitfalls for the Measurement of Teaching Quality. Dissertation, Mannheim: University of Mannheim, 2019.

BibTeX: Download