Correct electrostatic treatment of noncovalent interactions: the importance of polarization
Clark T, Politzer P, Murray JS (2015)
Publication Status: Published
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2015
Journal
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Book Volume: 5
Pages Range: 169-177
Journal Issue: 2
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1210
Abstract
The Hellmann-Feynman theorem assures us that the forces felt by the nuclei in a molecule or complex are purely classically electrostatic. Nevertheless, it is often claimed (incorrectly) that electrostatic considerations are not sufficient to explain noncovalent interactions. Such assertions arise largely from neglecting the polarization that is inherently part of the electrostatic interaction, and must be taken into account. Accordingly, we now outline the requirements for a correct electrostatic treatment and discuss the difference between physical observables and quantities that arise from mathematical models. Polarization and donor-acceptor charge transfer are shown to be equivalent for weak interactions. However, polarization is a physical observable while charge transfer, in this context, is mathematical modelling. We also discuss some popular schemes for analyzing noncovalent interactions. (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
United States (USA) (US)How to cite
APA:
Clark, T., Politzer, P., & Murray, J.S. (2015). Correct electrostatic treatment of noncovalent interactions: the importance of polarization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 5(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1210
MLA:
Clark, Timothy, Peter Politzer, and Jane S. Murray. "Correct electrostatic treatment of noncovalent interactions: the importance of polarization." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 5.2 (2015): 169-177.
BibTeX: Download