Comparison of physical and physicochemical methods for 3D printing application with the focus on the unconfined uniaxial compression test
Pott U, Jakob C, Wolf J, Stephan D (2023)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2023
Journal
Book Volume: 395
Article Number: 132260
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132260
Abstract
For a commercial success of 3D concrete printing, standardisation is necessary to enable industrial production. To select methods for standardisation from the material side, detailed knowledge of suitable methods and of material behaviour is required in advance. Therefore, this study aims to compare different methods for investigating stiff printable mortars during the transition regime of a non-Newtonian fluid to a cohesive frictional material by physical and physicochemical methods focusing on the unconfined uniaxial compression test. The study shows that all methods exhibit comparable progressions, although the results are affected differently by self-heating, material composition and progressive hydration.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
Germany (DE)How to cite
APA:
Pott, U., Jakob, C., Wolf, J., & Stephan, D. (2023). Comparison of physical and physicochemical methods for 3D printing application with the focus on the unconfined uniaxial compression test. Construction and Building Materials, 395. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132260
MLA:
Pott, Ursula, et al. "Comparison of physical and physicochemical methods for 3D printing application with the focus on the unconfined uniaxial compression test." Construction and Building Materials 395 (2023).
BibTeX: Download