Gniza J, Wrede M (2022)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2022
Pages Range: 1-21
DOI: 10.1017/S0047279422000903
Many policies target the economic and social consequences of regional inequality. This study experimentally investigates factors explaining the public degree of consent to financial transfers to disadvantaged regions. The main hypothesis of this study is that most people use the deservingness-heuristic not only to judge individuals but also to judge regions. We argue that people advocate interregional transfers based on perceived deservingness determined by recipient region’s need, lack of responsibility for the need, likelihood of reciprocity, and by a shared identity. To support this hypothesis, we conducted a factorial survey in Germany asking respondents to rate transfers to needy regions under different hypothetical conditions. We demonstrate, as predicted by the deservingness hypothesis, that consent to transfers to other regions is positively influenced by the extent of need and, in particular, past effort of the recipient region as well as by a shared identity. The results suggest that regional policies are particularly accepted when they target needs caused by factors beyond the control of recipient regions.
APA:
Gniza, J., & Wrede, M. (2022). Public Acceptance of Regional Redistribution in Germany: A Survey Experiment on the Perceived Deservingness of Regions. Journal of Social Policy, 1-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000903
MLA:
Gniza, Jan, and Matthias Wrede. "Public Acceptance of Regional Redistribution in Germany: A Survey Experiment on the Perceived Deservingness of Regions." Journal of Social Policy (2022): 1-21.
BibTeX: Download