Heinzelmann N, Hartmann S (2022)
Publication Language: English
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2022
Book Volume: 200
Pages Range: 1-13
URI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03584-3#citeas
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03584-3
Open Access Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03584-3
We argue that social deliberation may increase an agent’s confidence and credence under certain circumstances. An agent considers a proposition H and assigns a probability to it. However, she is not fully confident that she herself is reliable in this assignment. She then endorses H during deliberation with another person, expecting him to raise serious objections. To her surprise, however, the other person does not raise any objections to H. How should her attitudes toward H change? It seems plausible that she should (i) increase the credence she assigns to H and, at the same time, (ii) increase the reliability she assigns to herself concerning H (i.e. her confidence). A Bayesian model helps us to investigate under what conditions, if any, this is rational.
APA:
Heinzelmann, N., & Hartmann, S. (2022). Deliberation and confidence change. Synthese, 200, 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03584-3
MLA:
Heinzelmann, Nora, and Stephan Hartmann. "Deliberation and confidence change." Synthese 200 (2022): 1-13.
BibTeX: Download