Stemmler M, Endres J, King S, Ritter B, Becker K (2021)
Publication Language: English
Publication Type: Journal article, Original article
Publication year: 2021
Book Volume: 3
Pages Range: 283-297
Journal Issue: 104
Do radicalized Muslim prisoners differ from non-radicalized Muslim prisoners with regard to Kruglanski's (2004) quest for significance (QFS), need for (cognitive) closure (NFC), and their frame alignment regarding ideological and religious issues? To answer this research question N = 26 male inmates from Bavarian prisons were interviewed. The radicalized prisoners or extremists (n = 13) had been identified as Salafi or Jihadi adherents by the Bavarian Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Bayerischer Verfassungsschutz) and therefore had a security note. The comparison group were non-radicalized Muslim inmates (n = 13); the vast majority had a migration background.
APA:
Stemmler, M., Endres, J., King, S., Ritter, B., & Becker, K. (2021). Psychological Differences between Radicalized and non-Radicalized Muslim Prisoners: A Qualitative Analysis of their Frame Alignment. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 3(104), 283-297. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0131
MLA:
Stemmler, Mark, et al. "Psychological Differences between Radicalized and non-Radicalized Muslim Prisoners: A Qualitative Analysis of their Frame Alignment." Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 3.104 (2021): 283-297.
BibTeX: Download