Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison

Skelton E, Matthew J, Li Y, Khanal B, Martinez JJC, Toussaint N, Gupta C, Knight C, Kainz B, Hajnal JV, Rutherford M (2021)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2021

Journal

Book Volume: 27

Pages Range: 519-526

Journal Issue: 2

DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.006

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical evaluation of deep learning (DL) tools is essential to compliment technical accuracy metrics. This study assessed the image quality of standard fetal head planes automatically-extracted from three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound fetal head volumes using a customised DL-algorithm. Methods: Two observers retrospectively reviewed standard fetal head planes against pre-defined image quality criteria. Forty-eight images (29 transventricular, 19 transcerebellar) were selected from 91 transabdominal fetal scans (mean gestational age = 26 completed weeks, range = 20+5–32+3 weeks). Each had two-dimensional (2D) manually-acquired (2D-MA), 3D operator-selected (3D-OS) and 3D-DL automatically-acquired (3D-DL) images. The proportion of adequate images from each plane and modality, and the number of inadequate images per plane was compared for each method. Inter and intra-observer agreement of overall image quality was calculated. Results: Sixty-seven percent of 3D-OS and 3D-DL transventricular planes were adequate quality. Forty-five percent of 3D-OS and 55% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes were adequate. Seventy-one percent of 3D-OS and 86% of 3D-DL transventricular planes failed with poor visualisation of intra-cranial structures. Eighty-six percent of 3D-OS and 80% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes failed due to inadequate visualisation of cerebellar hemispheres. Image quality was significantly different between 2D and 3D, however, no significant difference between 3D-modalities was demonstrated (p < 0.005). Inter-observer agreement of transventricular plane adequacy was moderate for both 3D-modalities, and weak for transcerebellar planes. Conclusion: The 3D-DL algorithm can automatically extract standard fetal head planes from 3D-head volumes of comparable quality to operator-selected planes. Image quality in 3D is inferior to corresponding 2D planes, likely due to limitations with 3D-technology and acquisition technique. Implications for practice: Automated image extraction of standard planes from US-volumes could facilitate use of 3DUS in clinical practice, however image quality is dependent on the volume acquisition technique.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Skelton, E., Matthew, J., Li, Y., Khanal, B., Martinez, J.J.C., Toussaint, N.,... Rutherford, M. (2021). Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison. Radiography, 27(2), 519-526. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.006

MLA:

Skelton, Emily, et al. "Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison." Radiography 27.2 (2021): 519-526.

BibTeX: Download