Matthew Effects in Science and the Serial Diffusion of Ideas: Testing Old Ideas with New Methods

Farys R, Wolbring T (2021)


Publication Language: English

Publication Type: Journal article, Original article

Publication year: 2021

Journal

Pages Range: 505–526

Article Number: 2

Journal Issue: 2

DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00129

Abstract

The Matthew effect has become a standard concept in science studies and beyond to describe processes of cumulative advantage. Despite its wide success, a rigorous quantitative analysis for Merton’s original case for Matthew effects—the Nobel Prize—is still missing. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring the causal effect of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel (hereafter the Nobel Prize in Economics). Furthermore, we test another of Merton’s ideas: successful papers can draw attention to cited references, leading to a serial diffusion of ideas. Based on the complete Web of Science 1900–2011, we estimate the causal effects of Nobel Prizes compared to a synthetic control group which we constructed by combining different matching techniques. We find clear evidence for a Matthew effect upon citation impacts, especially for papers published within 5 years before the award. Further, scholars from the focal field of the award are particularly receptive to the award signal. In contrast to that, we find no evidence that the Nobel Prize causes a serial diffusion of ideas. Papers cited by future Nobel laureates do not gain in citation impact after the award.

Authors with CRIS profile

How to cite

APA:

Farys, R., & Wolbring, T. (2021). Matthew Effects in Science and the Serial Diffusion of Ideas: Testing Old Ideas with New Methods. Quantitative Science Studies, 2, 505–526. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00129

MLA:

Farys, Rudolf, and Tobias Wolbring. "Matthew Effects in Science and the Serial Diffusion of Ideas: Testing Old Ideas with New Methods." Quantitative Science Studies 2 (2021): 505–526.

BibTeX: Download