Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data

Furukawa TA, Suganuma A, Ostinelli EG, Andersson G, Beevers CG, Shumake J, Berger T, Boele FW, Buntrock C, Carlbring P, Choi I, Christensen H, Mackinnon A, Dahne J, Huibers MJ, Ebert DD, Farrer L, Forand NR, Strunk DR, Ezawa ID, Forsell E, Kaldo V, Geraedts A, Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Brabyn S, Hadjistavropoulos HD, Schneider LH, Johansson R, Kenter R, Kivi M, Björkelund C, Kleiboer A, Riper H, Klein JP, Schröder J, Meyer B, Moritz S, Bücker L, Lintvedt O, Johansson P, Lundgren J, Milgrom J, Gemmill AW, Mohr DC, Montero-Marin J, Garcia-Campayo J, Nobis S, Zarski AC, O'Moore K, Williams AD, Newby JM, Perini S, Phillips R, Schneider J, Pots W, Pugh NE, Richards D, Rosso IM, Rauch SL, Sheeber LB, Smith J, Spek V, Pop VJ, Ünlü B, van Bastelaar KM, van Luenen S, Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Vernmark K, Warmerdam L, van Straten A, Zagorscak P, Knaevelsrud C, Heinrich M, Miguel C, Cipriani A, Efthimiou O, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P (2021)

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2021

Journal

Book Volume: 8

Pages Range: 500-511

Journal Issue: 6

DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00077-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is a viable delivery format of CBT for depression. However, iCBT programmes include training in a wide array of cognitive and behavioural skills via different delivery methods, and it remains unclear which of these components are more efficacious and for whom. METHODS: We did a systematic review and individual participant data component network meta-analysis (cNMA) of iCBT trials for depression. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to Jan 1, 2019, that compared any form of iCBT against another or a control condition in the acute treatment of adults (aged ≥18 years) with depression. Studies with inpatients or patients with bipolar depression were excluded. We sought individual participant data from the original authors. When these data were unavailable, we used aggregate data. Two independent researchers identified the included components. The primary outcome was depression severity, expressed as incremental mean difference (iMD) in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores when a component is added to a treatment. We developed a web app that estimates relative efficacies between any two combinations of components, given baseline patient characteristics. This study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42018104683. FINDINGS: We identified 76 RCTs, including 48 trials contributing individual participant data (11 704 participants) and 28 trials with aggregate data (6474 participants). The participants' weighted mean age was 42·0 years and 12 406 (71%) of 17 521 reported were women. There was suggestive evidence that behavioural activation might be beneficial (iMD -1·83 [95% credible interval (CrI) -2·90 to -0·80]) and that relaxation might be harmful (1·20 [95% CrI 0·17 to 2·27]). Baseline severity emerged as the strongest prognostic factor for endpoint depression. Combining human and automated encouragement reduced dropouts from treatment (incremental odds ratio, 0·32 [95% CrI 0·13 to 0·93]). The risk of bias was low for the randomisation process, missing outcome data, or selection of reported results in most of the included studies, uncertain for deviation from intended interventions, and high for measurement of outcomes. There was moderate to high heterogeneity among the studies and their components. INTERPRETATION: The individual patient data cNMA revealed potentially helpful, less helpful, or harmful components and delivery formats for iCBT packages. iCBT packages aiming to be effective and efficient might choose to include beneficial components and exclude ones that are potentially detrimental. Our web app can facilitate shared decision making by therapist and patient in choosing their preferred iCBT package. FUNDING: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia (AU) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) / University Amsterdam Netherlands (NL) Linköping University Sweden (SE) Trinity College Dublin Ireland (IE) McLean Hospital United States (USA) (US) University of York United Kingdom (GB) University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia (AU) Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam UMC) / Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra Netherlands (NL) University of Oxford United Kingdom (GB) University of Regina Canada (CA) Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) Germany (DE) Imperial College London / The Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine United Kingdom (GB) St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Canada (CA) University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs universitet Sweden (SE) Leiden University Netherlands (NL) Freie Universität Berlin Germany (DE) Hofstra University United States (USA) (US) Universität Bern Switzerland (CH) University of Leeds United Kingdom (GB) Australian National University (ANU) Australia (AU) Kyoto University / 京都大学 Kyōto daigaku Japan (JP) University of Sydney (USYD) Australia (AU) Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) United States (USA) (US) Stockholm University / Stockholms universitet Sweden (SE) University of Nottingham United Kingdom (GB) Oregon Research Institute United States (USA) (US) Karolinska Institute Sweden (SE) Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Spain (ES) Norwegian Centre for E-health Research Norway (NO) Northwestern University United States (USA) (US) Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Boston and Harvard Medical School United States (USA) (US) Technische Universität München (TUM) Germany (DE) University of Texas at Austin United States (USA) (US) Ohio State University United States (USA) (US) Klinikum Osnabrück Germany (DE) The University of Melbourne Australia (AU) Fontys University of Applied Sciences Netherlands (NL) University of Twente Netherlands (NL) Tilburg University Netherlands (NL) PsyQ Netherlands (NL) University of Bergen / Universitetet i Bergen Norway (NO) Gaia AG Germany (DE) Universität zu Lübeck Germany (DE)

How to cite

APA:

Furukawa, T.A., Suganuma, A., Ostinelli, E.G., Andersson, G., Beevers, C.G., Shumake, J.,... Cuijpers, P. (2021). Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(6), 500-511. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00077-8

MLA:

Furukawa, Toshi A., et al. "Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data." The Lancet Psychiatry 8.6 (2021): 500-511.

BibTeX: Download