Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet - A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary

Kulke L, Poulin-Dubois D, Rakoczy H, Burnside K, Crivello C, Doerenberg S, Edwards K, Krist H, Kulke L, Liszkowski U, Low J, Perner J, Powell L, Priewasser B, Rafetseder E, Ruffman T (2018)


Publication Status: Published

Publication Type: Journal article, Review article

Publication year: 2018

Journal

Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Book Volume: 48

Pages Range: 302-315

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005

Abstract

The commentary by Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate raises a number of crucial issues concerning the replicability and validity of measures of false belief in infancy. Although we agree with some of their arguments, we believe that they underestimate the replication crisis in this area. In our response to their commentary, we first analyze the current empirical situation. The upshot is that, given the available evidence, it remains very much an open question whether infants possess a rich theory of mind. We then draw out more general conclusions for future collaborative studies that have the potential to address this open question.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Kulke, L., Poulin-Dubois, D., Rakoczy, H., Burnside, K., Crivello, C., Doerenberg, S.,... Ruffman, T. (2018). Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet - A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary. Cognitive Development, 48, 302-315. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005

MLA:

Kulke, Louisa, et al. "Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet - A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary." Cognitive Development 48 (2018): 302-315.

BibTeX: Download