Models of necessity
Clark T, Hicks MG (2020)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2020
Journal
Book Volume: 16
Pages Range: 1649-1661
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.16.137
Abstract
The way chemists represent chemical structures as two-dimensional sketches made up of atoms and bonds, simplifying the complex three-dimensional molecules comprising nuclei and electrons of the quantum mechanical description, is the everyday language of chemistry. This language uses models, particularly of bonding, that are not contained in the quantum mechanical description of chemical systems, but has been used to derive machine-readable formats for storing and manipulating chemical structures in digital computers. This language is fuzzy and varies from chemist to chemist but has been astonishingly successful and perhaps contributes with its fuzziness to the success of chemistry. It is this creative imagination of chemical structures that has been fundamental to the cognition of chemistry and has allowed thought experiments to take place. Within the everyday language, the model nature of these concepts is not always clear to practicing chemists, so that controversial discussions about the merits of alternative models often arise. However, the extensive use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in chemistry, with the aim of being able to make reliable predictions, will require that these models be extended to cover all relevant properties and characteristics of chemical systems. This, in turn, imposes conditions such as completeness, compactness, computational efficiency and nonredundancy on the extensions to the almost universal Lewis and VSEPR bonding models. Thus, AI and ML are likely to be important in rationalizing, extending and standardizing chemical bonding models. This will not affect the everyday language of chemistry but may help to understand the unique basis of chemical language.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
Germany (DE)How to cite
APA:
Clark, T., & Hicks, M.G. (2020). Models of necessity. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 16, 1649-1661. https://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.137
MLA:
Clark, Timothy, and Martin G. Hicks. "Models of necessity." Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 16 (2020): 1649-1661.
BibTeX: Download