Hummel P (2017)
Publication Language: English
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2017
Book Volume: 82
Pages Range: 363-378
Journal Issue: 2
URI: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10670-016-9822-x.pdf
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-016-9822-x
Open Access Link: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10670-016-9822-x.pdf
This paper examines three proposals on the difference between the complex and the simple view about personal identity: Parfit’s original introduction of the distinction, Gasser and Stefan’s definition, and Noonan’s recent proposal. I argue that the first two classify the paradigm cases of simplicity as complex, while Noonan’s proposal makes simplicity and complexity turn on features whose relevance for the distinction is questionable. Given these difficulties, I examine why we should be interested in whether a position is complex or simple. I describe two purposes of having a distinction, and show that extant accounts of the complex versus simple distinction fail to serve these. I argue that unless we find a satisfying account of the difference between complex and simple positions, we should not frame discourses on personal identity in these terms.
APA:
Hummel, P. (2017). Against the complex versus simple distinction. Erkenntnis, 82(2), 363-378. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9822-x
MLA:
Hummel, Patrik. "Against the complex versus simple distinction." Erkenntnis 82.2 (2017): 363-378.
BibTeX: Download