Basic geriatric assessment does not predict in-hospital mortality after PEG placement

Beitrag in einer Fachzeitschrift


Details zur Publikation

Autorinnen und Autoren: Smoliner C, Volkert D, Wittrich A, Sieber C, Wirth R
Zeitschrift: BMC Geriatrics
Verlag: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2012
Band: 12
ISSN: 1471-2318


Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an established procedure for long-term nutrition. However, studies have underlined the importance of proper patient selection as mortality has been shown to be relatively high in acute illness and certain patient groups, amongst others geriatric patients. Objective of the study was to gather information about geriatric patients receiving PEG and to identify risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality after PEG placement.Methods: All patients from the GEMIDAS database undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in acute geriatric wards from 2006 to 2010 were included in a retrospective database analysis. Data on age, gender, main diagnosis leading to hospital admission, death in hospital, care level, and legal incapacitation were extracted from the main database of the Geriatric Minimum Data Set. Self-care capacity was assessed by the Barthel index, and cognitive status was rated with the Mini Mental State Examination or subjectively judged by the clinician. Descriptive statistics and group comparisons were chosen according to data distribution and scale of measurement, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine influence of various factors on hospital mortality.Results: A total of 1232 patients (60.4% women) with a median age of 82 years (range 60 to 99 years) were included. The mean Barthel index at admission was 9.5 +/- 14.0 points. Assessment of cognitive status was available in about half of the patients (n = 664), with 20% being mildly impaired and almost 70% being moderately to severely impaired. Stroke was the most common main diagnosis (55.2%). In-hospital mortality was 12.8%. In a logistic regression analysis, old age (odds ratio (OR) 1.030, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003-1.056), male sex (OR 1.741, 95% CI 1.216-2.493), and pneumonia (OR 2.641, 95% CI 1.457-4.792) or the diagnosis group 'miscellaneous disease' (OR 1.864, 95% CI 1.224-2.839) were identified as statistical risk factors for in-hospital death. Cognitive status did not have an influence on mortality (OR 0.447, CI 95% 0.248-1.650).Conclusion: In a nationwide geriatric database, no component of the basic geriatric assessment emerged as a significant risk factor for mortality after PEG placement, emphasizing individual decision-making.


FAU-Autorinnen und Autoren / FAU-Herausgeberinnen und Herausgeber

Sieber, Cornel Prof. Dr.
Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin (Geriatrie)
Volkert, Dorothee Prof. Dr. rer. nat.
Professur für Klinische Ernährung im Alter


Einrichtungen weiterer Autorinnen und Autoren

Bundesverband Geriatrie e. V.
St.-Marien-Hospital Borken


Zitierweisen

APA:
Smoliner, C., Volkert, D., Wittrich, A., Sieber, C., & Wirth, R. (2012). Basic geriatric assessment does not predict in-hospital mortality after PEG placement. BMC Geriatrics, 12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-52

MLA:
Smoliner, Christine, et al. "Basic geriatric assessment does not predict in-hospital mortality after PEG placement." BMC Geriatrics 12 (2012).

BibTeX: 

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2019-23-05 um 14:38