Payment scheme changes and effort Adjustment: The role of 2D:4D digit ratio

Beitrag in einer Fachzeitschrift
(Originalarbeit)


Details zur Publikation

Autorinnen und Autoren: Friedl A, Neyse L, Schmidt U
Zeitschrift: The Journal of Behavioral Economics
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2018
Band: 72
Seitenbereich: 86–94
ISSN: 0090-5720
Sprache: Englisch


Abstract


People are usually more productive when they are paid according to their performance. Yet, it is reported that women prefer fixed rate payment over performance based payment schemes. This study experimentally investigates i) whether absolute incentives are effective without the knowledge of an alternative incentive scheme, ii) the possible role of the sexually dimorphic 2D:4D digit ratio, which is claimed to be a negative bio-marker of prenatal testosterone exposure, in effort provision. Results show that a switch from a piece rate to a fixed rate payment scheme reduces effort provision in a real effort task while switching in the other direction increases effort provision. When the piece rate is replaced with fixed payment, men and participants with lower 2D:4D show a greater decrease in effort than the rest. We do not observe any impact of gender or 2D:4D on effort adjustment behavior when fixed payment is replaced with a piece rate. Our results also contribute to the discussion on the incentive compatibility of the Slider Task.



FAU-Autorinnen und Autoren / FAU-Herausgeberinnen und Herausgeber

Friedl, Andreas Dr.
Lehrstuhl für Volkswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Wirtschaftstheorie


Einrichtungen weiterer Autorinnen und Autoren

Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel


Zitierweisen

APA:
Friedl, A., Neyse, L., & Schmidt, U. (2018). Payment scheme changes and effort Adjustment: The role of 2D:4D digit ratio. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 72, 86–94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.11.007

MLA:
Friedl, Andreas, Levent Neyse, and Ulrich Schmidt. "Payment scheme changes and effort Adjustment: The role of 2D:4D digit ratio." The Journal of Behavioral Economics 72 (2018): 86–94.

BibTeX: 

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2019-02-01 um 21:10