On the Valuation of Investment Guarantees in Unit-Linked Life Insurance: A Customer Perspective

Gatzert N, Huber C, Schmeiser H (2011)


Publication Language: English

Publication Type: Journal article, Original article

Publication year: 2011

Journal

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Book Volume: 36

Pages Range: 3-29

Journal Issue: 1

DOI: 10.1057/gpp.2010.35

Abstract

Interest rate guarantees in unit-linked life insurance products ensure that at contract maturity, at least a minimum guaranteed amount is paid, even if the mutual fund falls below the guaranteed level. Strongly depending on the riskiness of the underlying mutual fund, these guarantees can be of substantial value. However, while insurer pricing is based on the replication of cash flows, customers are more likely to base their decisions on individual preferences. The aim of this paper is to contrast reservation prices for guarantees in unit-linked life insurance policies based on customers subjective willingness to pay with a financial pricing approach, an investigation that has not been undertaken to date. To do so, we use an online questionnaire survey and calculate reservation prices using option pricing theory. Our findings reveal that even though the majority of the participants in the online questionnaire are employed in the field of insurance, subjective prices are difficult to derive and are significantly lower on average than the prices obtained using a financial pricing model. However, a considerable portion of participants is still willing to pay a substantially higher price. 

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Gatzert, N., Huber, C., & Schmeiser, H. (2011). On the Valuation of Investment Guarantees in Unit-Linked Life Insurance: A Customer Perspective. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 36(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2010.35

MLA:

Gatzert, Nadine, Carin Huber, and Hato Schmeiser. "On the Valuation of Investment Guarantees in Unit-Linked Life Insurance: A Customer Perspective." Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 36.1 (2011): 3-29.

BibTeX: Download