Comparison of MOE and Blind LMS

Schober R, Gerstacker W, Lampe L (2003)

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2003

Journal

IEEE Communications Letters Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Book Volume: 7

Pages Range: 204-206

Journal Issue: 5

DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2003.812177

Abstract

In this letter, we provide a rigorous analytical comparison of two blind adaptive algorithms for adjustment of the minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) filter for multiple access interference (MAI) suppression for direct-square code-division multiple access (DS-CDMA). In particular, we compare the popular minimum-output-energy (MOE) algorithm and the blind least-mean-square algorithm (BLMS) in terms of complexity, transient behavior, convergence, stability, and steady-state performance. We show analytically that the MOE algorithm enjoys a faster speed of convergence and has a superior steady-state performance, while the BLMS algorithm is computationally less complex.

Authors with CRIS profile

Robert Schober Lehrstuhl für Digitale Übertragung Wolfgang Gerstacker Lehrstuhl für Digitale Übertragung

How to cite

APA:

Schober, R., Gerstacker, W., & Lampe, L. (2003). Comparison of MOE and Blind LMS. IEEE Communications Letters, 7(5), 204-206. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2003.812177

MLA:

Schober, Robert, Wolfgang Gerstacker, and Lutz Lampe. "Comparison of MOE and Blind LMS." IEEE Communications Letters 7.5 (2003): 204-206.

BibTeX: Download