Validity of an inertial sensor-based system for the assessment of spatio-temporal parameters in people with multiple sclerosis
Zahn A, Koch V, Schreff L, Oschmann P, Winkler J, Gaßner H, Müller R (2023)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2023
Journal
Book Volume: 14
Article Number: 1164001
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1164001
Abstract
Background: Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) reflects disease progression or may be used to evaluate treatment response. To date, marker-based camera systems are considered as gold standard to analyze gait impairment in PwMS. These systems might provide reliable data but are limited to a restricted laboratory setting and require knowledge, time, and cost to correctly interpret gait parameters. Inertial mobile sensors might be a user-friendly, environment- and examiner-independent alternative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of an inertial sensor-based gait analysis system in PwMS compared to a marker-based camera system. Methods: A sample N = 39 PwMS and N = 19 healthy participants were requested to repeatedly walk a defined distance at three different self-selected walking speeds (normal, fast, slow). To measure spatio-temporal gait parameters (i.e., walking speed, stride time, stride length, the duration of the stance and swing phase as well as max toe clearance), an inertial sensor system as well as a marker-based camera system were used simultaneously. Results: All gait parameters highly correlated between both systems (r > 0.84) with low errors. No bias was detected for stride time. Stance time was marginally overestimated (bias = −0.02 ± 0.03 s) and gait speed (bias = 0.03 ± 0.05 m/s), swing time (bias = 0.02 ± 0.02 s), stride length (0.04 ± 0.06 m), and max toe clearance (bias = 1.88 ± 2.35 cm) were slightly underestimated by the inertial sensors. Discussion: The inertial sensor-based system captured appropriately all examined gait parameters in comparison to a gold standard marker-based camera system. Stride time presented an excellent agreement. Furthermore, stride length and velocity presented also low errors. Whereas for stance and swing time, marginally worse results were observed.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
Germany (DE)How to cite
APA:
Zahn, A., Koch, V., Schreff, L., Oschmann, P., Winkler, J., Gaßner, H., & Müller, R. (2023). Validity of an inertial sensor-based system for the assessment of spatio-temporal parameters in people with multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1164001
MLA:
Zahn, Annalena, et al. "Validity of an inertial sensor-based system for the assessment of spatio-temporal parameters in people with multiple sclerosis." Frontiers in Neurology 14 (2023).
BibTeX: Download