Gewalt SM, Helde SM, Ibrahim T, Mayer K, Schmidt R, Bott-Fluegel L, Hoppe K, Ott I, Hieber J, Morath T, Byrne RA, Kufner S, Cassese S, Hoppmann P, Fusaro M, Schunkert H, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Schuepke S (2018)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2018
Book Volume: 11
Article Number: e006074
Journal Issue: 8
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006074
BACKGROUND: The value of vascular closure devices (VCD) in women undergoing transfemoral catheterization has not been sufficiently investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a sex-specific analysis of 1395 women enrolled in a large-scale, randomized, multicenter trial, in which patients undergoing transfemoral diagnostic coronary angiography were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to arteriotomy closure with an intravascular VCD, extravascular VCD, or manual compression (MC). Primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 different VCD compared with MC regarding vascular access-site complications at 30 days. A secondary comparison was between 2 different types of contemporary VCD. Overall, women were at higher risk for vascular access-site complications compared with men (9.0% versus 6.4%; P=0.002). Vascular access-site complications were comparable in women assigned to VCD and MC (8.6% versus 9.8%; P=0.451). There was no interaction of treatment effect and sex (P
APA:
Gewalt, S.M., Helde, S.M., Ibrahim, T., Mayer, K., Schmidt, R., Bott-Fluegel, L.,... Schuepke, S. (2018). Comparison of vascular closure devices versus manual compression after femoral artery puncture in women gender-based analysis of a large scale, randomized clinical trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006074
MLA:
Gewalt, Senta M., et al. "Comparison of vascular closure devices versus manual compression after femoral artery puncture in women gender-based analysis of a large scale, randomized clinical trial." Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 11.8 (2018).
BibTeX: Download