Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Children and Adolescents-Opportunities and Limitations of the ESIN Technique

Kalbitz M, Fischer A, Weber B, Mayer B, Lackner I, Preßmar J (2022)


Publication Language: English

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2022

Journal

Book Volume: 11

Article Number: 7345

Journal Issue: 24

DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247345

Abstract

Background: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the gold standard for non-overweight children aged 6-12 years. However, the complication rate using elastic stable intramedullary nailing is considerably high. Nevertheless, the question arises of whether the indication for elastic stable intramedullary nailing therapy can be extended and which factors must be taken into account when determining the indication. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients <18 years admitted with diaphyseal femur fracture at a Level I Trauma Center in Germany between 2005 and 2017 was performed. In total, 118 patients were included. For the classification of femur fractures in children, the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long-Bone Fractures (AO-PCCF) was applied. Results: Simple oblique fractures (32-D/5.1) occurred in most of the patients. Patients with simple oblique fractures were significantly younger compared to patients with simple transverse (32-D/4.1) or multifragmentary (32-D/5.2) fracture type according to the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long-Bone Fractures. Most patients were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (68 patients, 58%). Although children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing were older than those treated conservatively (25%, n = 29, mean age 1.5, median age 1.0), the children in the elastic stable intramedullary nailing group were comparatively young (range 1-12 years, mean age 5.4, median age 5). A total of 32 children below the age of 6 years were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Complications were more frequent in patients with overhead extension (50%) compared to conservative treatment with a spica cast (17%) or elastic stable intramedullary nailing (15%). Conclusions: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing therapy was associated with a low complication rate and was, therefore, a safe and frequently used treatment strategy in diaphyseal femur fractures with satisfactory results, even though the age groups were expanded in favor of younger patients.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Kalbitz, M., Fischer, A., Weber, B., Mayer, B., Lackner, I., & Preßmar, J. (2022). Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Children and Adolescents-Opportunities and Limitations of the ESIN Technique. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247345

MLA:

Kalbitz, Miriam, et al. "Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Children and Adolescents-Opportunities and Limitations of the ESIN Technique." Journal of Clinical Medicine 11.24 (2022).

BibTeX: Download