The dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in people with noncommunicable diseases: A study protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Geidl W, Schlesinger S, Mino E, Miranda L, Ryan A, Bartsch K, Janz L, Pfeifer K (2019)


Publication Type: Journal article, Review article

Publication year: 2019

Journal

Book Volume: 9

Journal Issue: 9

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028653

Abstract

Introduction

This study protocol outlines our planned systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of post-diagnosis physical activity and mortality in people with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs).

Methods and analysis

This study is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Protocols (PRISMA-P). A systematic literature search will be conducted in various databases – namely, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science – by two researchers in order to identify prospective observational studies that investigate post-diagnosis physical activity or activity-related energy expenditure and mortality in individuals with NCDs. The target population is adults (≥ 18 years of age) with one of the following nine NCDs: low back pain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, breast cancer, lung cancer, stroke or ischemic heart disease. We will focus on all-cause mortality as the primary outcome and investigate indication-specific mortality as the secondary outcome. For each study identified as a result of the literature search, we will conduct graphical dose–response analyses of mortality as a function of activity-related energy consumption. If more than two studies are available for one disease, we will perform linear and non-linear dose–response meta-analyses for said disease using random effects models. We will investigate the heterogeneity of the studies and publication bias. To assess the risk of bias and the quality of the included studies, we will use the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, which is a Cochrane tool.

Ethics and dissemination

This systematic review will be conducted in compliance with ethical precepts. As the systematic review is based on published studies, approval from an ethics committee is not required. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

This study is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42018103357

Strengths and limitations

Our systematic review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the reporting guidelines provided in the PRISMA-P statement and the reporting guidelines of the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE).

The scope of our systematic search is wide-reaching, as it includes nine NCDs and three extensive medical databases.

The study uses the novel ROBINS-I tool.

However, the observational cohort studies do not provide a conclusive answer regarding the causality between physical activity and mortality.

Authors with CRIS profile

How to cite

APA:

Geidl, W., Schlesinger, S., Mino, E., Miranda, L., Ryan, A., Bartsch, K.,... Pfeifer, K. (2019). The dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in people with noncommunicable diseases: A study protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open, 9(9). https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028653

MLA:

Geidl, Wolfgang, et al. "The dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in people with noncommunicable diseases: A study protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies." BMJ Open 9.9 (2019).

BibTeX: Download