Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression

Journal article


Publication Details

Author(s): Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Reijnders M, Ebert D
Journal: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Publication year: 2019
Volume: 28
Journal issue: 1
Pages range: 21-30
ISSN: 2045-7960
eISSN: 2045-7979


Abstract

Aims. In the 1950s, Eysenck suggested that psychotherapies may not be effective at all. Twenty-five years later, the first meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials showed that the effects of psychotherapies were considerable and that Eysenck was wrong. However, since that time methods have become available to assess biases in meta-analyses.


FAU Authors / FAU Editors

Ebert, David Dr.
Lehrstuhl für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie


External institutions with authors

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) / University Amsterdam


How to cite

APA:
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Ebert, D. (2019). Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(1), 21-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000057

MLA:
Cuijpers, P., et al. "Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression." Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 28.1 (2019): 21-30.

BibTeX: 

Last updated on 2019-01-03 at 07:53