Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression

Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Reijnders M, Ebert D (2019)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2019

Journal

Book Volume: 28

Pages Range: 21-30

Journal Issue: 1

DOI: 10.1017/S2045796018000057

Abstract

Aims. In the 1950s, Eysenck suggested that psychotherapies may not be effective at all. Twenty-five years later, the first meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials showed that the effects of psychotherapies were considerable and that Eysenck was wrong. However, since that time methods have become available to assess biases in meta-analyses.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Ebert, D. (2019). Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(1), 21-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000057

MLA:

Cuijpers, P., et al. "Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression." Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 28.1 (2019): 21-30.

BibTeX: Download