Monitoring of naevus density at age 6: Is it both feasible and meaningful?

Uter W, Fießler C, Gefeller O, Pfahlberg A (2016)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2016

Journal

Book Volume: 219

Pages Range: 118-22

Journal Issue: 1

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.09.008

Abstract

Instruments for the evaluation of campaigns targeting the reduction of UV exposure in the population, and thus skin cancer risk, are needed.To examine the "childhood monitoring of naevus density" approach suggested some 10 years ago in a routine setting of mandatory pre-school examinations.Data were collected between 1999 and 2005 in Göttingen, Wolfenbüttel, Northeim, Salzgitter, and Erlangen. Besides basic data, freckling, iris and hair colour, and "Fitzpatrick skin type" as well as counts of melanocytic naevi were documented. Negative binomial regression analysis quantified the association between naevus counts and above factors, and year and site of examination, respectively.Of 12,809 children examined at five different sites over a period of 6 years, 11,345 were eligible for the analysis. While differences between sites were marked and significant, only a very minute, albeit significant, decrease in risk was found between the reference group (Göttingen 1999/2000) and the last year examined in Göttingen (2005).Significant between-site variation in the analysis adjusted for constitutional factors points to problems with standardization; thus, a broad application of this instrument does not seem to be advisable.

Authors with CRIS profile

How to cite

APA:

Uter, W., Fießler, C., Gefeller, O., & Pfahlberg, A. (2016). Monitoring of naevus density at age 6: Is it both feasible and meaningful? International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 219(1), 118-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.09.008

MLA:

Uter, Wolfgang, et al. "Monitoring of naevus density at age 6: Is it both feasible and meaningful?" International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 219.1 (2016): 118-22.

BibTeX: Download