% Encoding: UTF-8
@COMMENT{BibTeX export based on data in FAU CRIS: https://cris.fau.de/}
@COMMENT{For any questions please write to cris-support@fau.de}
@inproceedings{faucris.265528786,
address = {NEW YORK},
author = {Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi Kalyani, Marzieh and Jamali Kooshkghazi, Vahid and Schober, Robert},
booktitle = {2021 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (WCNC)},
doi = {10.1109/wcnc49053.2021.9417328},
faupublication = {yes},
month = {Jan},
note = {CRIS-Team WoS Importer:2021-10-29},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {IEEE},
title = {{Channel} {Modeling} for {IRS} -{Assisted} {FSO} {Systems}},
venue = {Nanjing, PEOPLES R CHINA},
year = {2021}
}
@article{faucris.267491131,
abstract = {Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based communications is a promising new technology that can add a wide range of new capabilities to the current network infrastructure. Given the flexibility, cost-efficiency, and convenient use of UAVs, they can be deployed as temporary base stations (BSs) for on-demand situations like BS overloading or natural disasters. In this work, a UAV-based communication system with radio frequency (RF) access links to the mobile users (MUs) and a free-space optical (FSO) backhaul link to the ground station (GS) is considered. In particular, the RF and FSO channels in this network depend on the UAV's positioning and (in)stability. The relative position of the UAV with respect to the MUs impacts the likelihood of a line-of-sight (LOS) connection in the RF link and the instability of the hovering UAV affects the quality of the FSO channel. Thus, taking these effects into account, we analyze the end-to-end system performance of networks employing UAVs as buffer-aided (BA) and non-buffer-aided (non-BA) relays in terms of the ergodic sum rate. Simulation results validate the accuracy of the proposed analytical derivations and reveal the benefits of buffering for compensation of the random fluctuations caused by the UAV's instability. Our simulations also show that the ergodic sum rate of both BA and non-BA UAV-based relays can be enhanced considerably by optimizing the positioning of the UAV. We further study the impact of the MU density and the weather conditions on the end-to-end system performance.},
author = {Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi, Marzieh and Jamali, Vahid and Schober, Robert},
doi = {10.1109/OJCOMS.2020.2969492},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society},
month = {Jan},
note = {CRIS-Team WoS Importer:2021-12-24},
pages = {164-178},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Ergodic} {Sum} {Rate} {Analysis} of {UAV}-{Based} {Relay} {Networks} {With} {Mixed} {RF}-{FSO} {Channels}},
volume = {1},
year = {2020}
}
@article{faucris.267075895,
abstract = {Free-space optical (FSO) systems are able to offer the high data-rate, secure, and cost-efficient communication links required for applications such as wireless front- and backhauling for 5G and 6G communication networks. Despite the substantial advancement of FSO systems over the past decades, the requirement of a line-of-sight connection between transmitter and receiver remains a key limiting factor for their deployment. In this article, we discuss the potential role of intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs) as a solution to relax this requirement. We present an overview of existing optical IRS technologies; compare optical IRSs with radio frequency IRSs and optical relays; and identify various open problems for future research on IRS-assisted FSO communications.},
author = {Jamali, Vahid and Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi, Marzieh and Schmauß, Bernhard and Schober, Robert and Poor, H. Vincent},
doi = {10.1109/MCOM.001.2100406},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {IEEE Communications Magazine},
note = {CRIS-Team WoS Importer:2021-12-10},
pages = {57-63},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Intelligent} {Reflecting} {Surface} {Assisted} {Free}-{Space} {Optical} {Communications}},
volume = {59},
year = {2021}
}
@article{faucris.273220594,
abstract = {In this paper, we investigate the modeling and design of intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-assisted optical communication systems, which can circumvent the line-of-sight (LOS) requirement in multi-link free space optical (FSO) systems. The FSO laser beams incident on the optical IRSs have a Gaussian power intensity profile and a nonlinear phase profile, whereas the plane waves in radio frequency (RF) systems have a uniform power intensity profile and a linear phase profile. Given these substantial differences, the results available for IRS-assisted RF systems are not applicable to IRS-assisted FSO systems. Therefore, we develop a new analytical channel model for point-to-point IRS-assisted FSO systems based on the Huygens-Fresnel principle. Our analytical model captures the impact of the size, position, and orientation of the IRS as well as its phase shift profile on the end-to-end channel. To allow the sharing of the optical IRS by multiple FSO links, we propose three different protocols, namely the time division (TD), IRS-division (IRSD), and IRS homogenization (IRSH) protocols. The proposed protocols address the specific characteristics of FSO systems including the non-uniformity and possible misalignment of the laser beams. Furthermore, to compare the proposed IRS sharing protocols, we analyze the bit error rate (BER) and the outage probability of IRS-assisted multi-link FSO systems in the presence of inter-link interference. Our simulation results validate the accuracy of the proposed analytical channel model for IRS-assisted FSO systems and confirm that this model is applicable for both large and intermediate IRS-receiver lens distances. Furthermore, we show that for the proposed IRSD and IRSH protocols, inter-link interference becomes negligible if the laser beams are properly centered on the IRS and the transceivers are carefully positioned, respectively. Moreover, in the absence of misalignment errors, the IRSD protocol outperforms the other protocols, whereas in the presence of misalignment errors, the IRSH protocol performs significantly better than the IRSD protocol.},
author = {Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi, Marzieh and Jamali Kooshkghazi, Vahid and Schmauß, Bernhard and Schober, Robert},
doi = {10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3163767},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {IEEE Transactions on Communications},
keywords = {Analytical models},
note = {CRIS-Team Scopus Importer:2022-04-15},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Modeling} and {Design} of {IRS}-{Assisted} {Multi}-{Link} {FSO} {Systems}},
year = {2022}
}
@article{faucris.314306871,
abstract = {The line-of-sight (LOS) requirement of free-space optical (FSO) systems can be relaxed by employing optical relays or optical intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs). In this paper, we show that the power reflected from FSO IRSs and collected at the receiver (Rx) lens may scale quadratically or linearly with the IRS size or may saturate at a constant value. We analyze the power scaling law for optical IRSs and unveil its dependence on the wavelength, transmitter (Tx)-to-IRS and IRS-to-Rx distances, beam waist, and Rx lens size. We also consider the impact of linear, quadratic, and focusing phase shift profiles across the IRS on the power collected at the Rx lens for different IRS sizes. Our results reveal that surprisingly the powers received for the different phase shift profiles are identical, unless the IRS operates in the saturation regime. Moreover, IRSs employing the focusing (linear) phase shift profile require the largest (smallest) size to reach the saturation regime. We also compare optical IRSs in different power scaling regimes with optical relays in terms of the outage probability, diversity and coding gains, and optimal placement. Our results show that, at the expense of a higher hardware complexity, relay-assisted FSO links yield a better outage performance at high signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), but optical IRSs can achieve a higher performance at low SNRs. Moreover, while it is optimal to place relays equidistant from Tx and Rx, the optimal location of optical IRSs depends on the phase shift profile and the power scaling regime they operate in.},
author = {Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi, Marzieh and Jamali, Vahid and Schober, Robert},
doi = {10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3327464},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {IEEE Transactions on Communications},
keywords = {Laser beams; Lenses; Optical network units; Optical receivers; Optical saturation; Optical transmitters; Relays},
note = {CRIS-Team Scopus Importer:2023-11-24},
pages = {1-1},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Optical} {IRSs}: {Power} {Scaling} {Law}, {Optimal} {Deployment}, and {Comparison} with {Relays}},
year = {2023}
}
@inproceedings{faucris.290179101,
abstract = {The line-of-sight (LOS) requirement of free-space optical (FSO) systems can be relaxed by employing optical relays and optical intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs). Unlike radio frequency (RF) IRSs, which typically exhibit a quadratic power scaling law, the power reflected from FSO IRSs and collected at the receiver lens may scale quadratically or linearly with the IRS size or may even saturate at a constant value. We analyze the power scaling law for optical IRSs and unveil its dependence on the wavelength, transmitter (Tx)-to-IRS and IRS-to-receiver (Rx) distances, beam waist, and lens size. We compare optical IRSs in different power scaling regimes with optical relays in terms of the outage probability, diversity and coding gains, and optimal placement. Our results show that, at the expense of a higher hardware complexity, relay-assisted FSO links yield a better outage performance at high signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), but optical IRSs can achieve a higher performance at low SNRs. Moreover, while it is optimal to place relays equidistant from Tx and Rx, the optimal location of IRSs depends on the power scaling regime they operate in.},
author = {Ajam, Hedieh and Najafi Kalyani, Marzieh and Jamali, Vahid and Schober, Robert},
booktitle = {2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2022 - Proceedings},
date = {2022-12-04/2022-12-08},
doi = {10.1109/GLOBECOM48099.2022.10001121},
faupublication = {yes},
isbn = {9781665435406},
note = {CRIS-Team Scopus Importer:2023-03-07},
pages = {1527-1533},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.},
title = {{Power} {Scaling} {Law} for {Optical} {IRSs} and {Comparison} with {Optical} {Relays}},
venue = {Virtual},
year = {2022}
}
@inproceedings{faucris.224287658,
abstract = {We consider a drone-based communication network, where several drones hover above an area and serve as mobile remote radio heads for a large number of mobile users. We assume that the drones employ free space optical (FSO) links for fronthauling of the users' data to a central unit. The main focus of this paper is to quantify the geometric loss of the FSO channel arising from random fluctuation of the position and orientation of the drones. In particular, we derive upper and lower bounds, corresponding approximate expressions, and a closed-form statistical model for the geometric loss. Simulation results validate our derivations and quantify the FSO channel quality as a function of the drone's instability, i.e., the variation of its position and orientation.