% Encoding: UTF-8
@COMMENT{BibTeX export based on data in FAU CRIS: https://cris.fau.de/}
@COMMENT{For any questions please write to cris-support@fau.de}
@book{faucris.213586876,
abstract = {
Freising gilt als einer der
wichtigsten Überlieferungsorte des Althochdeutschen. Die Quellenlage ist
hier aber noch immer nicht abschließend aufgearbeitet. Das zeigen die
bis in die jüngste Zeit anhaltenden Entdeckungen von Glossen. Die
Neufunde bestehen hauptsächlich aus sogenannten Griffelglossen,
unscheinbaren Eintragungen, die mit Schreibgriffeln in Handschriften
eingeritzt wurden. Sie stellen bedeutsame Zeugnisse des ältesten Deutsch
dar.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung vereinigt die Glossenkorpora
von vier aus Freising stammenden Handschriften des ausgehenden 8. und
frühen 9. Jahrhunderts. Im Zentrum der Arbeit steht die Präsentation des
integralen Bestands an Belegen im Kontext der jeweiligen Handschrift.
Sämtliche volkssprachige Glossen werden paläographisch, linguistisch und
glossierungsfunktional analysiert und kommentiert. Die Darstellung
schließt mit einer Neubeurteilung der frühen Freisinger
Glossenüberlieferung.
Der Band richtet sich an Interessierte
auf den Gebieten der historischen germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft,
der Glossenforschung und der Mediävistik, denen er mit der Edition und
Kommentierung von rund 1000 althochdeutschen Glossen ein umfangreiches
und weitgehend neu erhobenes Material zur Verfügung stellt
},
address = {Berlin},
author = {Ernst, Oliver and Nievergelt, Andreas and Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1515/9783110621952},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Lingua Historica Germanica 21},
title = {{Althochdeutsche} {Griffel}-, {Feder}- und {Farbstiftglossen} aus {Freising}. {Clm} 6293, {Clm} 6308, {Clm} 6383, {Clm} 21525},
year = {2019}
}
@article{faucris.123886884,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Archive in Bayern},
pages = {79–108},
peerreviewed = {No},
title = {{Althochdeutsche} {Griffelglossen} am {Beispiel} der {Handschrift} 10 des {Archivs} des {Bistums} {Augsburgs}},
volume = {7},
year = {2012}
}
@misc{faucris.110302324,
abstract = {
},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1075/dia.33.2.06sch},
faupublication = {no},
month = {Jan},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Annette} {Gerstenberg} & {Anja} {Voeste} ({Hgg}.) (2015): {Language} {Development}. {The} {Lifespan} {Perspective}},
year = {2016}
}
@incollection{faucris.243262433,
address = {Berlin, New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Handbuch Brief. Von der frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart.},
doi = {10.1515/9783110376531-017},
editor = {Marie I. Matthews-Schlinzig, Jörg Schuster, Gesa Steinbrink, Jochen Strobel},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {276-290},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {De Gruyter Reference},
title = {{Briefsteller}},
volume = {1},
year = {2020}
}
@misc{faucris.213588856,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Brigitte} {Ganswindt} (2017): {Landschaftliches} {Hochdeutsch}. {Rekonstruktion} der oralen {Prestigevarietät} im ausgehenden 19. {Jahrhundert}},
year = {2018}
}
@book{faucris.309844980,
address = {Berlin},
editor = {Grübl, Klaus and Huber, Judith and Pickl, Simon and Schäfer, Lea and Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
publisher = {Language Science Press},
title = {{Buchreihe}: {Advances} in {Historical} {Linguistics}},
url = {https://langsci-press.org/catalog/series/ahl},
year = {2022}
}
@incollection{faucris.266258706,
address = {Berlin, New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Foldenauer, Monika},
booktitle = {Historisches Codeswitching mit Deutsch},
doi = {10.1515/9783110752793},
editor = {Elvira Glaser, Michael Prinz, Stefaniya Ptashnyk},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {367-401},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Studia Linguistics Germanica},
title = {{Codeswitching} bei süddeutschen {Schreibern} des 19. {Jahrhunderts}},
volume = {140},
year = {2021}
}
@article{faucris.119380844,
abstract = {This paper examines intra-speaker variation in historical writing. Its purpose is to show that lower-class people were able to consciously switch between language forms of conceptual orality and distance in their texts. To test this hypothesis, the article focuses on code-switching phenomena in autobiographic writing by patients from the Southern German psychiatric hospitals in Irsee and Kaufbeuren (1852–1931). The corpus of this paper consists of c. 98,300 tokens by 22 writers, of whom 11 use code-switching. First, I develop a method to distinguish code-switching from code-mixing phenomena in written texts by combining structural with functional approaches. In the article’s empirical part, I analyse the writers’ different communicative repertoires and the structures and functions of code-switching. Writers use linguistic variants of both conceptual orality and distance for code-switching. Thereby, they often use dialect, regional, or Southern German language forms that are outside of their regular linguistic repertoires. This leads to a re-evaluation of diatopically marked variants as not necessarily reflecting a writer’s lack of standard competence, but on the contrary being his or her deliberate linguistic choices.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1515/jhsl-2016-0003},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics},
pages = {47-81},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Code} {Switching} in {Lower}-{Class} {Writing}. {Autobiographies} by {Patients} from {Southern} {German} {Psychiatric} {Hospitals}},
volume = {2},
year = {2016}
}
@article{faucris.109942844,
abstract = {This contribution applies MACHAS (1991) concept of the "flexible speaker" to a text genre that has remained unknown and hitherto has been unused: unforwarded letters and autobiographical texts from 19th century patients in psychiatric hospitals. Using a newly developed corpus of 212 texts (circa 165,000 words) from eight individuals, it will be demonstrated that even writers of the most common origin can flexibly choose their linguistic variety. In addition, these decisions can even be partially commented upon metalinguistically. By quantitatively comparing stigmaticized syntactic phenomena as well as regional and local dialect verb morphology, it becomes clear that the language use of writers with a similar socio-cultural background display clear divergences. Illness and/or age can lead to linguistic changes and either limit or prevent the deliberate choice of varieties.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik},
keywords = {intra-speaker variation;language history;lower-class writer;southern German;letter individuelle Variation;Sprachgeschichte;einfacher Schreiber;suddeutsch;Brief},
month = {Jan},
pages = {169-205},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Der} flexible {Schreiber} in der {Sprachgeschichte}. {Grammatische} {Variation} in süddeutschen {Patientenbriefen} des 19. {Jahrhunderts}},
volume = {82},
year = {2015}
}
@incollection{faucris.121040084,
address = {Berlin / New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Paradigmen der aktuellen Sprachgeschichtsforschung},
editor = {Vilmos Ágel, Andreas Gardt},
faupublication = {no},
pages = {317–332},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Jahrbuch für germanistische Sprachgeschichte},
title = {{Ein} {Paradigmenwechsel} in der {Althochdeutschforschung}?},
volume = {5},
year = {2014}
}
@article{faucris.213587691,
abstract = {Research on intra-speaker variation is scarce within
the field of historical sociolinguistics, particularly with regard to German
data. This paper examines whether the major approaches of modern
sociolinguistics in this area, namely attention to speech, audience design, and
speaker design, can be applied to the analysis of historical material. The
paper focuses on a comparative analysis of eleven letters written between 1891
and 1905 by a mentally ill day-labourer at the southern German psychiatric
hospital of Kaufbeuren. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods
for the examination of two graphemic variables provides evidence for all three
factors of stylistic variation. In addition, the deterioration of the writer’s
health appears to give rise to language change in his later letters; and this
change is shown to be highly statistically significant. The paper thus offers
new perspectives on the analysis of intra-speaker variation in historical data
in particular and for language history ‘from below’ in general and demonstrates
the need to re-evaluate the linguistic competence of lower-class writers of the
pas},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Neuphilologische Mitteilungen},
pages = {101-120},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Factors} of {Intra}-{Speaker} {Variation} in {Nineteenth}-{Century} {Lower}-{Class} {Writing}},
volume = {119},
year = {2018}
}
@book{faucris.281307672,
abstract = {Patientenbriefe bilden eine Textsorte, die der Sprachwissenschaft
bislang unbekannt war. Diese Untersuchung basiert auf einem neu
erschlossenen Korpus historischer Patiententexte der süddeutschen
psychiatrischen Einrichtung Kaufbeuren-Irsee, die mehrere tausend
Egodokumente des 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhunderts von Schreiberinnen und
Schreibern aus einem breiten sozialen Spektrum überliefert.
Im Fokus der sozio- und variationslinguistischen Analysen dieser
individuenzentrierten Arbeit stehen nähe- und distanzsprachliche
Merkmale in 191 privaten und offiziellen Briefen von 28 Personen (22
Patienten, 6 Angehörige), die allesamt eine beachtliche sprachliche
Flexibilität und Varietätenkompetenz aufweisen. Dies wird gestützt durch
detaillierte Untersuchungen intraindividueller Variation innerhalb von
Texten sowie in der Diachronie. Die Arbeit rückt den Sprachgebrauch
marginalisierter Personen ins Zentrum des Interesses und ermöglicht die
Etablierung einer ‚inklusiven‘ Sprachgeschichte.
},
address = {Heidelberg},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.33675/2022-82538575},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {Winter},
series = {Germanistische Bibliothek},
title = {{Flexible} {Schreiber} in der {Sprachgeschichte}. {Intraindividuelle} {Variation} in {Patientenbriefen} (1850–1936)},
year = {2022}
}
@misc{faucris.263211170,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Flexible} {Schreiber} in der {Sprachgeschichte}. {Intraindividuelle} {Variation} in {Patientenbriefen} des 19. {Jahrhunderts}},
year = {2021}
}
@book{faucris.110442024,
address = {Heidelberg},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
keywords = {Frühmittelalter; Glosse; Mittelalter; Kontextualität; Schriftlichkeit},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {Winter},
series = {Germanistische Bibliothek},
title = {{Frühmittelalterliche} {Glossen}. {Ein} {Beitrag} zur {Funktionalität} und {Kontextualität} mittelalterlicher {Schriftlichkeit}.},
url = {https://www.winter-verlag.de/de/detail/978-3-8253-6382-6/Schiegg{\_}Fruehmittelalterliche{\_}Glossen/},
volume = {52},
year = {2015}
}
@phdthesis{faucris.119380404,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
school = {Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg},
title = {{Frühmittelalterliche} {Glossen}. {Ein} {Beitrag} zur {Funktionalität} und {Kontextualität} mittelalterlicher {Schriftlichkeit}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{faucris.110300784,
abstract = {Handwritten texts carry significant information, extending beyond the meaning of their words. Modern neurology, for example, benefits from the interpretation of the graphic features of writing and drawing for the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases and disorders. This article examines how handwriting analysis can be used, and has been used historically, as a methodological tool for the assessment of medical conditions and how this enhances our understanding of historical contexts of writing. We analyze handwritten material, writing tests and letters, from patients in an early 20th-century psychiatric hospital in southern Germany (Irsee/Kaufbeuren). In this institution, early psychiatrists assessed handwriting features, providing us novel insights into the earliest practices of psychiatric handwriting analysis, which can be connected to Berkenkotter's research on medical admission records. We finally consider the degree to which historical handwriting bears semiotic potential to explain the psychological state and personality of a writer, and how future research in written communication should approach these sources.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Thorpe, Deborah},
doi = {10.1177/0741088316681988},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Written Communication},
keywords = {handwriting;disorder;20th century;psychiatry;neurology;Germany},
month = {Jan},
pages = {30-53},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Historical} {Analyses} of {Disordered} {Handwriting}: {Perspectives} on {Early} 20th-{Century} {Material} {From} a {German} {Psychiatric} {Hospital}},
volume = {34},
year = {2017}
}
@article{faucris.124031204,
abstract = {This paper provides a novel view on marginalia from the perspective of linguistic pragmatics. It is based on the observation that existing studies often exclude entries in medieval manuscripts that do not comment on the text directly. Many of them, however, are crucial for understanding what medieval monks did when they studied manuscripts. Searle's (1969) Speech Act Theory, his typology of illocutionary forces, offers a suitable framework for the systematic analysis of the different kinds of manuscript entries and to reconstruct the intellectual contexts of medieval glossing. We can see that in addition to assertives (i.e., glosses that provide further information on a specific text passage) expressives, directives, commissives and declaratives can also be identified in the margins of medieval manuscripts. Sometimes, even the perlocution of marginalia, their effect on medieval readers, can be traced today.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1075/jhp.17.1.03sch},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Journal of Historical Pragmatics},
keywords = {glosses;manuscript studies;marginalia;medieval studies;speech act theory;vernacular},
month = {Jan},
pages = {55-78},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{How} to do things with glosses {Illocutionary} forces in the margins of medieval manuscripts},
volume = {17},
year = {2016}
}
@misc{faucris.227902535,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Ingrid} {Schröder} & {Carolin} {Jürgens} ({Hgg}.) (2017): {Sprachliche} {Variation} in autobiographischen {Interviews}. {Theoretische} und methodische {Zugänge}},
year = {2018}
}
@book{faucris.263210572,
address = {Berlin},
doi = {10.1515/9783110743036},
editor = {Werth, Alexander and Bülow, Lars and Pfenninger, Simone and Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs},
title = {{Intra}-individual {Variation} in {Language}},
url = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783110743036/html},
volume = {363},
year = {2021}
}
@article{faucris.235155793,
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Freund, Sabrina},
doi = {10.13092/lo.99.5964},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Linguistik Online},
pages = {51-76},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Intraindividuelle} {Variation} auf lexikalisch-semantischer {Ebene} in {Texten} unroutinierter {Schreiber} des 19. {Jahrhunderts}},
url = {https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/5964},
volume = {99},
year = {2019}
}
@book{faucris.309842743,
address = {Oxford},
doi = {10.3726/b19157},
editor = {Schiegg, Markus and Huber, Judith},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
publisher = {Peter Lang},
series = {Historical Sociolinguistics},
title = {{Intra}-{Writer} {Variation} in {Historical} {Sociolinguistics}},
volume = {5},
year = {2023}
}
@misc{faucris.119381724,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Jens} {P}. {Lanwer} (2015): {Regionale} {Alltagssprache}. {Theorie}, {Methodologie} und {Empirie} einer gebrauchsbasierten {Areallinguistik}},
year = {2016}
}
@misc{faucris.122360084,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Joanna} {Kopaczyk} & {Andreas} {H}. {Jucker} ({Hgg}.) (2013): {Communities} of {Practice} in the {History} of {English}},
year = {2015}
}
@misc{faucris.121046024,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Jörg} {Riecke} (2016): {Geschichte} der deutschen {Sprache}. {Eine} {Einführung}},
year = {2017}
}
@misc{faucris.123716164,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Judith} {Nobels} (2013): ({Extra}){Ordinary} {Letters}. {A} {View} from below on {Seventeenth}-{Century} {Dutch}},
year = {2014}
}
@misc{faucris.213588581,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1515/zrs-2019-2019},
faupublication = {yes},
peerreviewed = {No},
title = {{Jürg} {Fleischer} (2017): {Geschichte}, {Anlage} und {Durchführung} der {Fragebogen}-{Erhebungen} von {Georg} {Wenkers} 40 {Sätzen}. {Dokumentation}, {Entdeckungen} und {Neubewertungen}},
year = {2018}
}
@incollection{faucris.263208903,
address = {Berlin},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Gunkler-Frank, Katharina},
booktitle = {Historische Schrift- und Schriftlichkeitsforschung},
doi = {10.1515/jbgsg-2021-0004},
editor = {Paul Rössler, Peter Besl, Anna Saller},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {26-48},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte},
title = {{Konzentration} als {Faktor} intraindividueller {Variation} im {Textverlauf}. {Graphematische} {Untersuchungen} an historischen {Patientenbriefen}},
volume = {12},
year = {2021}
}
@article{faucris.299607470,
abstract = {This article examines the language shift and the accompanying changing
status of French and German in the Erlangen Huguenot community (southern
Germany) during the approximately 150 years following the first French
immigrants settling in Erlangen in 1686. Our quantitative analysis is
based on a diachronically-balanced corpus of 314 archival sources
transmitted from this community and provides an overview of the language
shift from French to German over time. The linguistic choices are
influenced by the social group of the writers and addressees, the
direction of communication and the domain of the texts. Our qualitative
analysis focuses on multilingual texts and linguistic practices
throughout the time period examined and traces the changing status of
the two languages in the community, from French as the dominant language
in the earlier years, to the use of German in conceptually oral texts
with retention of French in school contexts and by the consistory, to
French as a social symbol of the intellectuals in the early 19th
century. Our paper provides empirical accounts for an under-researched
context of language shift and contributes to historical sociolinguistic
research on historical language contact, multilingualism, and linguistic
identit},
author = {Pfäffle, Anna and Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1515/jhsl-2022-0003},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics},
keywords = {French; German; Huguenots; identity; language contact; language shift; multilingualism},
pages = {1-30},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Language} shift in the {Erlangen} {Huguenot} community},
volume = {9},
year = {2023}
}
@incollection{faucris.122202784,
address = {Berlin / New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Scribes as Agents of Language Change},
editor = {Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, Bettina Beinhoff},
faupublication = {no},
pages = {39–69},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Studies in Language Change},
title = {{Medieval} {Glossators} as {Agents} of {Language} {Change}},
volume = {10},
year = {2013}
}
@misc{faucris.124030984,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Michael} {Elmentaler} & {Peter} {Rosenberg} (2015): {Norddeutscher} {Sprachatlas} ({NOSA}). {Band} 1: {Regiolektale} {Sprachlagen}},
year = {2017}
}
@article{faucris.236948329,
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Eichhorn-Hartmeyer, Christina},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Korrespondenzblatt des Vereins für Niederdeutsche Sprachforschung},
pages = {40-53},
peerreviewed = {No},
title = {{Nieder}- und {Norddeutsches} in {Patientenakten} des frühen 20. {Jahrhunderts}},
volume = {127},
year = {2020}
}
@incollection{faucris.243262691,
address = {Berlin, New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Handbuch Brief. Von der frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart},
doi = {10.1515/9783110376531-041},
editor = {Marie I. Matthews-Schlinzig, Jörg Schuster, Gesa Steinbrink, Jochen Strobel},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {570-581},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {De Gruyter Reference},
title = {{Patientenbrief}},
volume = {1},
year = {2020}
}
@incollection{faucris.227902190,
address = {London},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Urban Microcosms (1789-1940)},
editor = {Margit Dirscherl, Astrid Köhler},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {239-256},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {Institute of Modern Languages Research},
series = {imlr books},
title = {{Patient} {Narratives} as {Distorted} {Mirrors}: {Letters} from a {Nineteenth}-{Century} {Psychiatric} {Hospital}},
volume = {13},
year = {2019}
}
@incollection{faucris.235156160,
address = {Berlin, New York},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Pfeiffer, Christian},
booktitle = {Formulaic language and new data: Theoretical and methodological implications},
doi = {10.1515/9783110669824-011},
editor = {Elisabeth Piirainen, Natalia Filatkina, Sören Stumpf, Christian Pfeiffer},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {249-277},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
series = {Formelhafte Sprache / Formulaic Language},
title = {{Religious} formulae in historical lower-class patient letters},
volume = {3},
year = {2020}
}
@article{faucris.122637284,
abstract = {Early medieval colophons are the scribes' inscriptions at the end of a manuscript, in which they provide some kind of information about their copying endeavour. After focusing on the colophons' relevance for manuscript studies and, among other fields, for cultural history and linguistics, this paper illustrates how existing research has either collected them as antiquarian curiosities' (Moreno Olalla 2013: 144) or has traced the development of single formulae and used them to reconstruct the diachronic, diatopic and diastratic distribution of colophons and manuscripts. Based on different kinds of colophons, this contribution establishes a classification of colophons with regard to formal, contextual and functional characteristics. Linguistic Speech Act Theory is applied to classify the huge variety of colophons according to four basic categories of human communication. Finally, the article discusses how colophons changed when the early medieval, monastic scriptoria were replaced by late medieval, secular book shops.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1080/00393274.2015.1101354},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Studia Neophilologica},
keywords = {colophons;manuscripts;scribes;medieval studies;Speech Act Theory},
pages = {129-147},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
title = {{Scribes}' {Voices}: {The} {Relevance} and {Types} of {Early} {Medieval} {Colophons}},
volume = {88},
year = {2016}
}
@article{faucris.221620322,
abstract = {This paper examines intra-individual “script switching”, alternation between Kurrentschrift (“German script”) and “Latin script”, within nineteenth-century handwritten German texts. We attribute a semiotic value to the textual surface and assume that graphic variation conveys meaning and should therefore be considered a communicative practice. After an overview of the development of Kurrentschrift and of the functions and ideologies behind script switching with a particular focus on nineteenth-century German schools, our paper presents three case studies from different contexts of lower-class writing. First, we analyse the writings of a tailor in a southern German psychiatric hospital, who not only used script switching to comply with the relevant conventions, but also to make his texts appear “educated”. The second case study focuses on the French–German border region, which, especially Alsace-Lorraine, has historically been characterised by multilingualism and shifting national affiliations. Here, the use of different scripts and languages reflects both contemporary norms and the writers’ identity. Finally, we examine the letters of two Frisian sailors who had migrated to America and wrote home after adjusting to life in their new home country. Frequent switches between different scripts and languages index both cultural practices and their hybrid identity in a multilingual context.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Sowada, Lena},
doi = {10.1080/00309230.2019.1622574},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Paedagogica Historica},
keywords = {emigrant letters; language history from below; nineteenth century; patient letters; Script switching; soldiers’ letters},
note = {CRIS-Team Scopus Importer:2019-07-02},
pages = {772-791},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Script} switching in nineteenth-century lower-class {German} handwriting},
volume = {55},
year = {2019}
}
@incollection{faucris.213588103,
address = {Turnhout},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {The Annotated Book in the Early Middle Ages: Practices of Reading and Writing},
doi = {10.1484/M.USML-EB.5.115022},
editor = {Mariken Teeuwen, Irene van Renswoude},
faupublication = {yes},
isbn = {978-2-503-56948-2},
pages = {237-261},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {Brepols},
series = {Utrecht Studies in Medieval Literacy},
title = {{Source} {Marks} in {Scholia}. {Evidence} from an {Early} {Medieval} {Gospel} {Manuscript}},
volume = {38},
year = {2017}
}
@article{faucris.121036344,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {JournaLIPP},
pages = {49–67},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
title = {{Teleologische} {Perspektiven} auf die althochdeutsche {Überlieferung} und ihre {Konsequenzen} für den {Quellenwert} von {Glossen}},
volume = {2},
year = {2013}
}
@incollection{faucris.109096284,
address = {Oxford},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Invisible Languages in the 19th Century},
editor = {Anna Havinga, Nils Langer},
faupublication = {no},
pages = {71–94},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
publisher = {Lang},
series = {Historical Sociolinguistics 2},
title = {{The} {Invisible} {Language} of {Patients} from {Psychiatric} {Hospital}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{faucris.124030324,
abstract = {This article examines the genesis and use of the German subordinate conjunction trotzdem. We begin by investigating the perception of this grammatical phenomenon in contemporary grammars and popular language guides. Based on analyses of corpora, both 'from below' and 'from above' (Elspa beta 2015), we attempt to answer the questions of how often trotzdem has appeared as a subordinate conjunction since the 19th century, whether it is a phenomenon of conceptual immediacy or distance, and what kind of regional distribution of usage can be observed. In the course of this analysis, we focus on both existing corpora and our newly compiled corpus of historical newspapers, which draws on digitized newspapers from GoogleBooks and ANNO - AustriaN Newspapers Online. The analyses show that trotzdem appears as a subordinate conjunction throughout the periods examined. It is a supra-regional phenomenon that is used quite commonly in German, predominantly in the northern and central eastern regions, and both in the language of immediacy and distance. During the 19th century, a three-stage grammaticalization process occurred (trotz dem, da beta > trotzdem/ trotz da beta > trotzdem), whereby compound spelling and the loss of da beta emerged and spread; the speed of this process, however, varied in different German-speaking regions. Today, both trotzdem and trotzdem dass are in use, whereby - according to our preliminary observations - the first variant is prevalent in the language of distance and the second in the language of immediacy.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus and Niehaus, Konstantin},
doi = {10.1515/zgl-2017-0003},
faupublication = {no},
journal = {Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik},
pages = {73-107},
peerreviewed = {No},
title = {{Trotzdem} als {Subjunktion} in {Geschichte} und {Gegenwart}},
volume = {45},
year = {2017}
}
@article{faucris.266337183,
abstract = {This paper presents a case study on the lexical substitution of Wärter (‘guard’) by Pfleger (‘nurse’) in records from a southern German psychiatric hospital around 1900. Its goal is to shed light on language variation and change from the perspective of idiolects. Therefore, I analyse how this change, implemented by official documents in 1876, spreads ‘from above’ into the written language of 108 patients and 10 family members. The results show a quick implementation of the new variant, comprising its semantic generalization and the near-complete replacement of the older variant. This process can sometimes be observed in individual lifespan changes, while other writers continue using Wärter in idiosyncratic ways. Finally, a comparison with two more general corpora (DWDS and Google Books) shows that this lexical change appears delayed and less consistent outside the hospital context.},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
doi = {10.1515/gcla-2021-0002},
faupublication = {yes},
journal = {Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association},
keywords = {variation; language change; idiolect; German; patient letters},
pages = {35-46},
peerreviewed = {unknown},
title = {{Variation} and change in idiolects: {Tracing} a lexical substitution inside a psychiatric hospital around 1900},
volume = {9},
year = {2021}
}
@incollection{faucris.227901599,
address = {Heidelberg},
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
booktitle = {Historische Soziolinguistik der Stadtsprachen. Kontakt - Variation - Wandel},
editor = {Simon Pickl, Stephan Elspaß},
faupublication = {yes},
pages = {171-189},
peerreviewed = {Yes},
publisher = {Winter},
series = {Germanistische Bibliothek},
title = {{Varietätenschichtungen} im 19. {Jahrhundert}. {Sprachkontakt}, -variation und -wandel in {Briefen} {Augsburger} {Patienten}},
volume = {67},
year = {2019}
}
@misc{faucris.106387864,
author = {Schiegg, Markus},
faupublication = {no},
peerreviewed = {automatic},
title = {{Viola} {Wilcken} (2015): {Historische} {Umgangssprachen} zwischen {Sprachwirklichkeit} und literarischer {Gestaltung}. {Formen}, {Funktionen} und {Entwicklungslinien} des ‚{Missingsch}'},
year = {2017}
}